Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34264329›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association of Remdesivir Treatment With Survival and Length of Hospital Stay Among US Veterans Hospitalized With COVID-19.

Michael E Ohl, Donald R Miller, Brian C Lund, Takaaki Kobayashi, Kelly Richardson Miell, Brice F Beck, Bruce Alexander, Kristina Crothers, Mary S Vaughan Sarrazin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Effect of ArtemiC in patients with COVID-19: A Phase II prospective study.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael E OhlCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City.
Donald R MillerCenter for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Bedford Health Care System, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Brian C LundCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City.
Takaaki KobayashiCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City.
Kelly Richardson MiellCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City.
Brice F BeckCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City.
Bruce AlexanderCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City.
Kristina CrothersVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Mary S Vaughan SarrazinCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City.
Iowa City VA Health Care System · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Randomized clinical trials have yielded conflicting results about the effects of remdesivir therapy on survival and length of hospital stay among people with COVID-19. Objective: To examine associations between remdesivir treatment and survival and length of hospital stay among people hospitalized with COVID-19 in routine care settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to identify adult patients in 123 VHA hospitals who had a first hospitalization with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from May 1 to October 8, 2020. Propensity score matching of patients initiating remdesivir treatment to control patients who had not initiated remdesivir treatment by the same hospital day was used to create the analytic cohort. Exposures: Remdesivir treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to death within 30 days of remdesivir treatment initiation (or corresponding hospital day for matched control individuals) and time to hospital discharge with time to death as a competing event. Associations between remdesivir treatment and these outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression in the matched cohort. Results: The initial cohort included 5898 patients admitted to 123 hospitals, 2374 (40.3%) of whom received remdesivir treatment (2238 men [94.3%]; mean [SD] age, 67.8 [12.8] years) and 3524 (59.7%) of whom never received remdesivir treatment (3302 men [93.7%]; mean [SD] age, 67.0 [14.4] years). After propensity score matching, the analysis included 1172 remdesivir recipients and 1172 controls, for a final matched cohort of 2344 individuals. Remdesivir recipients and matched controls were similar with regard to age (mean [SD], 66.6 [14.2] years vs 67.5 [14.1] years), sex (1101 men [93.9%] vs 1101 men [93.9%]), dexamethasone use (559 [47.7%] vs 559 [47.7%]), admission to the intensive care unit (242 [20.7%] vs 234 [19.1%]), and mechanical ventilation use (69 [5.9%] vs 45 [3.8%]). Standardized differences were less than 10% for all measures. Remdesivir treatment was not associated with 30-day mortality (143 remdesivir recipients [12.2%] vs 124 controls [10.6%]; log rank P = .26; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.83-1.36). Results were similar for people receiving vs not receiving dexamethasone at remdesivir initiation (dexamethasone recipients: adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.35; nonrecipients: adjusted HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.84-1.69). Remdesivir recipients had a longer median time to hospital discharge compared with matched controls (6 days [interquartile range, 4-12 days] vs 3 days [interquartile range, 1-7 days]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir treatment was not associated with improved survival but was associated with longer hospital stays. Routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds while not being associated with improvements in survival.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHospital MortalityLength of StayPatient DischargeVeteransAdenosine MonophosphateAgedAged, 80 and overAlanineAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral Agentsremdesivir

Identifiers

PMID34264329
PMCPMC8283561
OpenAlexW3180111237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.