Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34264174›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Expanded principles of ethics and its implementation during COVID-19 vaccine trials: A scoping evidence based research synthesis.

Vaibhav Kumar, Venetia Aranha, Rajni Rajgarhia, Abhishek Royal, Kedar Mehta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vaibhav KumarDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, TPCT'S Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Venetia AranhaTPCT's Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Rajni RajgarhiaDental Profiles, Bellandur, Bengaluru, India.
Abhishek RoyalDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health & Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Kedar MehtaCommunity Medicine Department, GMERS Medical College, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4374-9495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic will subside only through the emergence and distribution of an efficacious vaccine. The two main aspects that should be maintained in equilibrium: the dire necessity for speedy vaccine research and the need for safeguarding the research subjects, which is of utmost concern in research ethics. This opens up a discussion of what norms to follow during the clinical trials while developing the vaccine. As of now, various companies like Moderna, Pfizer, University of Oxford, Astra-Zeneca and so on have moved beyond the safety, efficacy and immunogenic studies. This narrative review explores and discusses the key principles of ethics: a principle of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice along with its ten general expanded principles. Furthermore, it delves into the different types of vaccines, their mechanisms, side effects, limitations, and advantages.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinesethicsIndiaprinciples

Identifiers

PMID34264174
PMCPMC8827634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.