Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34263663›Full record

ArticleThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry2022

Culturally competent, safe and equitable clinical care for Ma¯ori with bipolar disorder in New Zealand: The expert critique of Ma¯ori patients and Wha¯nau.

Tracy Haitana, Suzanne Pitama, Donna Cormack, Mau Te Rangimarie Clark, Cameron Lacey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tracy HaitanaMāori Indigenous Health Institute (MIHI), Department of the Dean University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2918-8249
Suzanne PitamaMāori Indigenous Health Institute (MIHI), Department of the Dean University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Donna CormackTe Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mau Te Rangimarie ClarkMāori Indigenous Health Institute (MIHI), Department of the Dean University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Cameron LaceyMāori Indigenous Health Institute (MIHI), Department of the Dean University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9898-6784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch designed to increase knowledge about Māori with bipolar disorder is required to understand how health services support wellbeing and respond to identified levels of community need. This paper synthesises the expert critique of Māori patients with bipolar disorder and their whānau regarding the nuances of cultural competence and safety in clinical encounters with the health system.

methodsA qualitative Kaupapa Māori Research methodology was used. A total of 24 semi-structured interviews were completed with Māori patients with bipolar disorder and members of their whānau. Structural, descriptive and pattern coding was completed using an adapted cultural competence framework to organise and analyse the data.

resultsThree themes were evident from participants' critique of clinical components of the health system. Theme 1 established that the efficacy of clinical care for bipolar disorder was dependent on Māori patients and whānau having clear pathways through care, and being able to access timely, consistent care from clinically and culturally competent staff. Theme 2 identified the influence of clinical culture in bipolar disorder services, embedded into care settings, expressed by staff, affecting the safety of clinical care for Māori. Theme 3 focused on the need for bipolar disorder services to prioritise clinical work with whānau, equip staff with skills to facilitate engagement and tailor care with resources to enhance whānau as well as patient wellbeing.

conclusionThe standard of clinical care for Māori with bipolar disorder in New Zealand does not align with practice guidelines, Māori models of health or clinical frameworks designed to inform treatment and address systemic barriers to equity. Research also needs to explore the role of structural and organisational features of the health system on Māori patient and whānau experiences of care.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderCultural CompetencyCulturally Competent CareHumansNew Zealandbipolar disordercultural competencecultural safetyMāoriqualitative

Identifiers

PMID34263663
PMCPMC9131406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.