Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34263455›Full record

ArticleVox sanguinis2022

Determinants of the intention to donate umbilical cord blood in pregnant women.

Mariana Fernandes, Guido Alessandri, Rubi Abbad, Caterina Grano

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Vox sanguinis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariana FernandesDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-2805
Guido AlessandriDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4731-5248
Rubi AbbadDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Caterina GranoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1899-0773
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesUmbilical cord blood (UCB) donation is a behaviour promoted by many countries' health systems. However, UCB donation is not a widespread behaviour among expectant mothers, and little is known about the reasons that may lead to it. The aim of the present study was to analyse the contribution of Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) variables among both primiparous and multiparous women in predicting intention to donate UCB. MATERIALS AND

methodsThree hundred seventy-six expectant mothers completed questionnaires that captured sociodemographic data, parity, previous donation, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control (PBC) and intention to donate UCB. Multigroup analysis structural equation modelling was conducted using Mplus (version 8.02).

resultsMultigroup path analyses showed that intentions were strongly predicted by subjective norms and moderately predicted by positive attitudes and PBC in both primiparous and multiparous women. TPB constructs explained 71% of the variance in intentions for both groups.

conclusionsFuture interventions to increase intention to donate among primiparous and multiparous women could primarily consider the influence of partner and significant others in determining positive intentions and secondarily target increasing positive attitudes and perceptions of control.

Indexed as

IntentionPregnant PeopleAttitudeFemaleFetal BloodHumansPregnancySurveys and Questionnairesdonor motivationdonorsembryonic stem cell

Identifiers

PMID34263455
PMCPMC9291455
OpenAlexW3181619420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.