Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34263433›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Multilevel Associations with Cancer Screening Among Women in Rural, Segregated Communities Within the Northeastern USA: a Mixed-Methods Study.

Jennifer L Moss, Kelsey Leach, Kelsey C Stoltzfus, Marni Granzow, Paul L Reiter, Tracy Onega, Lisa M Klesges, Mack T Ruffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer L MossDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, 134 Sipe Ave., #205, MC HS72, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. jmoss1@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-1344
Kelsey LeachDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, 134 Sipe Ave., #205, MC HS72, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Kelsey C StoltzfusDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, 134 Sipe Ave., #205, MC HS72, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Marni GranzowDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, 134 Sipe Ave., #205, MC HS72, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Paul L ReiterCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Tracy OnegaHuntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Lisa M KlesgesWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Mack T RuffinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, 134 Sipe Ave., #205, MC HS72, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.

Funding

Overcoming barriers to cancer screening among women living in rural and segregated communitiesK22CA225705 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI MOSS, JENNIFER LINDSAY · 2019 to 2022
$629k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA225705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recruited women (primarily non-Hispanic White) from 14 rural, segregated counties in a Northeastern US state for an explanatory sequential study: 100 women (ages 50-65 years) completed a survey, and 16 women participated in focus groups. We sought to identify personal (e.g., healthcare mistrust) and environmental (e.g., travel time to healthcare providers) factors related to colorectal and cervical cancer screening. Quantitatively, 89% of participants were up-to-date for cervical screening, and 65% for colorectal screening. Factors interacted such that compounding barriers were associated with lower odds of screening (e.g., insurance status and healthcare mistrust: interaction p = .02 for cervical; interaction p = .05 for colorectal). Qualitatively, three themes emerged regarding barriers to screening: privacy concerns, logistical barriers, and lack of trust in adequacy of healthcare services. While cancer screening was common in rural, segregated counties, women who reported both environmental and personal barriers to screening had lower uptake. Future interventions to promote screening can target these barriers.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRural PopulationCancer screeningCervical cancerColorectal cancerRacial residential segregationRuralWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID34263433
PMCPMC8279881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.