ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Design of puncher for recycling of waste film fragments.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the recycling of an entire piece of plastic film after farmland use has attracted significant attention, the film fragments generated by punching holes in such plastic films have never been studied. These film fragments can penetrate deeper into the soil more easily than whole pieces of plastic film, causing soil pollution. In this study, two new punchers with burrs were designed, and a group of comparative experiments were conducted on waste film fragment recycling. The results show that the average time required to complete the same task using punchers with two burrs (puncher 3) and one burr (puncher 2) can be reduced by 40.37% and 26.19%, respectively. The average success rates in recycling the film fragments are 91.67% and 68.17%, respectively. The performance of puncher 3 is better than that of puncher 2 for recycling the film fragments. Thus, the application of puncher 3 is beneficial for solving the problems in waste film recycling. Accordingly, the study is of great significance for protecting the soil environment, reducing "white pollution" and achieving China's sustainable development goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34263398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.