ArticleFolia microbiologica2021
Evaluation of endosulfan degradation capacity by six pure strains isolated from a horticulture soil.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vitro and in silico study of the endosulfan degradation by Bacillus subtilis sp. strain UAMC.Biodegradation · 2026Article
- Draft genome ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endosulfan is an organochlorine pesticide included in the Stockholm Convention for Persistent Organic Compounds. The utilization of endosulfan as the sole source of carbon and its mineralization was evaluated using pure strains of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus pseudomycoides, Peribacillus simplex, Enterobacter cloacae, Achromobacter spanius, and Pseudomonas putida, isolated from soil with historical pesticide use. The consumption of the α isomer of endosulfan by five of the six strains studied was higher than 95%, while B. subtilis degraded only 76% of the initial concentration (14 mg/L). On the other hand, the degradation of the β isomer was approximately 86% of the initial concentration (6 mg/L) by B. subtilis, P. simplex, and B. pseudomycoides and 95% by P. putida, E. cloacae, and A. spanius. The ability of A. spanius, P. simplex, and B. pseudomycoides to degrade endosulfan has not been previously reported. The production of endosulfan lactone by the Bacillus strains, as well as A. spanius and P. putida, indicated that endosulfan was degraded by the hydrolytic pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.