Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34263306›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2021

Combination treatment of liposomal amphotericin B and isavuconazole is synergistic in treating experimental mucormycosis.

Teclegiorgis Gebremariam, Yiyou Gu, Shakti Singh, Therese M Kitt, Ashraf S Ibrahim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Lipidomic Signatures inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. What Is New in Pulmonary Mucormycosis?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Assessment of Antifungal Pharmacodynamics.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Mucormycosis in 2023: an update on pathogenesis and management.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teclegiorgis GebremariamDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Yiyou GuDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Shakti SinghDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Therese M KittAstellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA.
Ashraf S IbrahimDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3787-8530
UCLA Medical Center · USAstellas Pharma (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Novel Toxins and Receptors in Mucormycosis Pathogenesis and TreatmentR01AI063503 · NIAID · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI IBRAHIM, ASHRAF S. · 2006 to 2025
$7.3M
NIAID NIH HHSNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLiposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) and isavuconazonium sulphate are commonly used antifungal drugs to treat mucormycosis. However, the efficacy of combination therapy of L-AMB/isavuconazonium sulphate versus monotherapy is unknown. We used an immunosuppressed mouse model of pulmonary mucormycosis to compare the efficacy of L-AMB/isavuconazonium sulphate versus either drug alone.

methodsNeutropenic mice were intratracheally infected with either Rhizopus delemar or Mucor circinelloides. Treatment with L-AMB, isavuconazonium sulphate, or a combination of both started 8 h post-infection and continued through to Day +4. Placebo mice received vehicle control. Survival to Day +21 and tissue fungal burden (by conidial equivalent using quantitative PCR) on Day +4, served as primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

resultsFor mice infected with R. delemar, L-AMB and isavuconazonium sulphate equally prolonged median survival time and enhanced survival versus placebo (an overall survival of 50% for either drug alone, versus 5% for placebo). Importantly, combination treatment resulted in an overall survival of 80%. Both antifungal drugs reduced tissue fungal burden of lungs and brain by ∼1.0-2.0 log versus placebo-treated mice. Treatment with combination therapy resulted in 2.0-3.5 log reduction in fungal burden of either organ versus placebo and 1.0 log reduction versus either drug alone. Similar treatment outcomes were obtained using mice infected with M. circinelloides.

conclusionsThe L-AMB/isavuconazonium sulphate combination demonstrated greater activity versus monotherapy in immunosuppressed mice infected with either of the two most common causes of mucormycosis. These studies warrant further investigation of L-AMB/isavuconazonium sulphate combination therapy as an optimal therapy of human mucormycosis.

Indexed as

MucormycosisAmphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsMiceMucorNitrilesPyridinesRhizopusTriazolesAmphotericin BAntifungal Agentsisavuconazoleliposomal amphotericin BNitrilesPyridinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID34263306
PMCPMC8446914
OpenAlexW3179792382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.