Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34263250›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021

Electronic pulmonary embolism clinical decision support and effect on yield of computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography: ePE-A pragmatic prospective cohort study.

Joseph R Bledsoe, Christopher Kelly, Scott M Stevens, Scott C Woller, Peter Haug, James F Lloyd, Todd L Allen, Allison M Butler, Jason R Jacobs, C Gregory Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joseph R BledsoeDepartment of Emergency Medicine Healthcare Delivery Institute Intermountain Healthcare Murray Utah USA.
Christopher KellyDepartment of Surgery Division of Emergency Medicine University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4494-1657
Scott M StevensDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray Utah USA.
Scott C WollerDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray Utah USA.
Peter HaugMedical Informatics Intermountain Healthcare Murray Utah USA.
James F LloydMedical Informatics Intermountain Healthcare Murray Utah USA.
Todd L AllenDepartment of Emergency Medicine Healthcare Delivery Institute Intermountain Healthcare Murray Utah USA.
Allison M ButlerOffice of Research Intermountain Healthcare Murray Utah USA.
Jason R JacobsAcute Care Research Intermountain Healthcare Murray Utah USA.
C Gregory ElliottDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray Utah USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMultiple professional societies recommend pre-test probability (PTP) assessment prior to imaging in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), however, PTP testing remains uncommon, with imaging occurring frequently and rates of confirmed PE remaining low. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of a clinical decision support tool embedded into the electronic health record to improve the diagnostic yield of computerized tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in suspected patients with PE in the emergency department (ED).

methodsBetween July 24, 2014 and December 31, 2016, 4 hospitals from a healthcare system embedded an optional electronic clinical decision support system to assist in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (ePE). This system employs the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) and revised Geneva Score (RGS) in series prior to CT imaging. We compared the diagnostic yield of CTPA) among patients for whom the physician opted to use ePE versus the diagnostic yield of CTPA when ePE was not used.

resultsDuring the 2.5-year study period, 37,288 adult patients were eligible and included for study evaluation. Of eligible patients, 1949 of 37,288 (5.2%) were enrolled by activation of the tool. A total of 16,526 CTPAs were performed system-wide. When ePE was not engaged, CTPA was positive for PE in 1556 of 15,546 scans for a positive yield of 10.0%. When ePE was used, CTPA identified PE in 211 of 980 scans (21.5% yield) (

conclusionsePE significantly increased the diagnostic yield of CTPA without missing 30-day clinically overt PE.

Indexed as

electronic clinical decisionemergency departmentpulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID34263250
PMCPMC8254596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.