Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34263231›Full record

ArticleFlorence Nightingale journal of nursing2021

Using Electronic Software for Nursing Documentation in Nursing Students.

Kamran Ranjbar, Raheleh Sabetsarvestani, Hossein Oghlaee, Parisa Sabet Sarvestani, Azizallah Dehghan, Zahra Hadian Shirazi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Florence Nightingale journal of nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06162000 (Investigation of the Effect of Decision Support System Integrated Nursing Care Plan Management System on Student Nurses' Care Plan Preparation Skills), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06162000 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Effect of Decision Support System Integrated Nursing Care Plan Management System on Student Nurses' Care Plan Preparation Skills

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled42ConditionsNurse's RoleArmsThe group that will use the developed software in case studies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kamran RanjbarFasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8968-3164
Raheleh SabetsarvestaniDepartment of Child Health and Diseases Nursing, Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Nursing, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1097-7056
Hossein OghlaeeSirjan University of Technology, Sirjan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8434-0840
Parisa Sabet SarvestaniDepartment of Nursing, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9681-5228
Azizallah DehghanNoncommunicable Disease Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-7345-0796
Zahra Hadian ShiraziCommunity-Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-6432-8641
Fasa University of Medical Sciences · IRNecmettin Erbakan University · TRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRSirjan University of Technology · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to assess the effect of using electronic software for nursing documentation on students.

methodA quasi-experimental study was performed. The study population comprised 80 nursing students who were randomly divided into 2 groups. The software used for nursing documentation was designed according to the nursing process model. Students in the experimental group received theoretical and practical training. The control group attended a 1-day course on the nursing process model. A questionnaire was used to assess student satisfaction in nursing documentation. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software 16 (Chicago, USA). The standard and comprehensiveness of documentation were analyzed using the summative content analysis with the MaxQDA 10 software (USA). TREND statement was followed for reporting.

resultsThe analysis showed that the mean scores of satisfaction in both groups increased significantly (

conclusionThe findings confirmed the usefulness of electronic software in improving the standard and comprehensiveness of nursing documentation and the students' satisfaction.

Indexed as

Documentationinformaticsnursing

Identifiers

PMID34263231
PMCPMC8245020
OpenAlexW3177238603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.