ReviewTherapeutic advances in reproductive health
Double or dual stimulation in poor ovarian responders: where do we stand?
Review in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Trial
- Double stimulation in the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim): a comparative evaluation of follicular and luteal phase response.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2026Article
- Empty Follicle Syndrome: Current Therapeutic Approaches and the Role of Triggering Agents in Assisted Reproductive Technology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization outcomes in double stimulation with conventional protocol in participants with poor ovarian response with minimal injection: An RCT.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025Article
- DuoStim Shows Comparable Efficacy but Better Efficiency than Two Conventional Stimulations in Poor/Suboptimal Responders Undergoing Vitrified Oocyte Accumulation for PGT-A.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Effectiveness of the GnRH Agonist/Antagonist Protocols for Different Poseidon Subgroups of Poor Ovarian Responders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Investigating Ovulation Induction Outcomes in Patients with Decreased Ovarian Reserve Treated with Double Stimulation during The Follicular and Luteal Phases Compared to The Conventional Antagonist Cycle: A Randomized Clinical Trial.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2024Article
- FSH/LH co-stimulation in Advanced Maternal Age (AMA) and hypo-responder patients - Arabian gulf delphi consensus group.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Article
- Influence of the starting day of luteal phase stimulation on double stimulation cycles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Observational
- Fertility Preservation: How to Preserve Ovarian Function in Children, Adolescents and Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Investigation of an efficient method of oocyte retrieval by dual stimulation for patients with cancer.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
- Treatment modalities for poor ovarian responders.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in our recognition of two to three follicular waves of development in a single menstrual cycle has challenged the dogmatic approach of ovarian stimulation for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.