ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Artificial intelligence for identification and characterization of colonic polyps.
Review in Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05734820 (Real-time Computer-aided Polyp/Adenoma Detection During Screening Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Real-time Computer-aided Polyp/Adenoma Detection During Screening Colonoscopy: a Single-center Crossover Trial
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Deep learning for digital pathology: A critical overview of methodological framework.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- ISM2 as a prognostic biomarker and mediator of immune infiltration in colorectal cancer: evidence from bioinformatics and experimental analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Breast, Lung, and Colon Cancer: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Emerging Technologies in Endoscopy for Gastrointestinal Neoplasms: A Comprehensive Overview.Cureus · 2024Review
- Accuracy of polyp characterization by artificial intelligence and endoscopists: a prospective, non-randomized study in a tertiary endoscopy center.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Digestive Endoscopy-Where Are We and Where Are We Going?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in gastroenterology: steps ahead.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy remains the gold standard exam for colorectal cancer screening due to its ability to detect and resect pre-cancerous lesions in the colon. However, its performance is greatly operator dependent. Studies have shown that up to one-quarter of colorectal polyps can be missed on a single colonoscopy, leading to high rates of interval colorectal cancer. In addition, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has proposed the "resect-and-discard" and "diagnose-and-leave" strategies for diminutive colorectal polyps to reduce the costs of unnecessary polyp resection and pathology evaluation. However, the performance of optical biopsy has been suboptimal in community practice. With recent improvements in machine-learning techniques, artificial intelligence-assisted computer-aided detection and diagnosis have been increasingly utilized by endoscopists. The application of computer-aided design on real-time colonoscopy has been shown to increase the adenoma detection rate while decreasing the withdrawal time and improve endoscopists' optical biopsy accuracy, while reducing the time to make the diagnosis. These are promising steps toward standardization and improvement of colonoscopy quality, and implementation of "resect-and-discard" and "diagnose-and-leave" strategies. Yet, issues such as real-world applications and regulatory approval need to be addressed before artificial intelligence models can be successfully implemented in clinical practice. In this review, we summarize the recent literature on the application of artificial intelligence for detection and characterization of colorectal polyps and review the limitation of existing artificial intelligence technologies and future directions for this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.