Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34263163›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Artificial intelligence for identification and characterization of colonic polyps.

Nasim Parsa, Michael F Byrne

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05734820 (Real-time Computer-aided Polyp/Adenoma Detection During Screening Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05734820 naunknown statusnot on this map

Real-time Computer-aided Polyp/Adenoma Detection During Screening Colonoscopy: a Single-center Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades DigestivasRan2020 to 2024Enrolled312ConditionsColorectal Polyp, Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal AdenomaArmsHD- colonoscopy, HD-colonoscopy assisted by AI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  9. Artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nasim ParsaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-266X
Michael F ByrneDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Satisfai Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy remains the gold standard exam for colorectal cancer screening due to its ability to detect and resect pre-cancerous lesions in the colon. However, its performance is greatly operator dependent. Studies have shown that up to one-quarter of colorectal polyps can be missed on a single colonoscopy, leading to high rates of interval colorectal cancer. In addition, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has proposed the "resect-and-discard" and "diagnose-and-leave" strategies for diminutive colorectal polyps to reduce the costs of unnecessary polyp resection and pathology evaluation. However, the performance of optical biopsy has been suboptimal in community practice. With recent improvements in machine-learning techniques, artificial intelligence-assisted computer-aided detection and diagnosis have been increasingly utilized by endoscopists. The application of computer-aided design on real-time colonoscopy has been shown to increase the adenoma detection rate while decreasing the withdrawal time and improve endoscopists' optical biopsy accuracy, while reducing the time to make the diagnosis. These are promising steps toward standardization and improvement of colonoscopy quality, and implementation of "resect-and-discard" and "diagnose-and-leave" strategies. Yet, issues such as real-world applications and regulatory approval need to be addressed before artificial intelligence models can be successfully implemented in clinical practice. In this review, we summarize the recent literature on the application of artificial intelligence for detection and characterization of colorectal polyps and review the limitation of existing artificial intelligence technologies and future directions for this field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer-aided detectioncomputer-aided diagnosisconvolutional neural networkdeep learning

Identifiers

PMID34263163
PMCPMC8252334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.