Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34263139›Full record

ArticleNanoscale advances2021

Biocompatibility, uptake and subcellular localization of bacterial magnetosomes in mammalian cells.

Frank Mickoleit, Cornelia Jörke, Stefan Geimer, Denis S Maier, Jörg P Müller, Johanna Demut, Christine Gräfe, Dirk Schüler, Joachim H Clement

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biogenic Imaging Contrast Agents.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Frank MickoleitDept. Microbiology, University of Bayreuth D-95447 Bayreuth Germany dirk.schueler@uni-bayreuth.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1943-3960
Cornelia JörkeDept. Hematology and Medical Oncology, Jena University Hospital D-07747 Jena Germany joachim.clement@med.uni-jena.de.
Stefan GeimerElectron Microscopy, University of Bayreuth D-95447 Bayreuth Germany.
Denis S MaierDept. Microbiology, University of Bayreuth D-95447 Bayreuth Germany dirk.schueler@uni-bayreuth.de.
Jörg P MüllerInstitute of Molecular Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Jena University Hospital D-07745 Jena Germany.
Johanna DemutDept. Hematology and Medical Oncology, Jena University Hospital D-07747 Jena Germany joachim.clement@med.uni-jena.de.
Christine GräfeDept. Hematology and Medical Oncology, Jena University Hospital D-07747 Jena Germany joachim.clement@med.uni-jena.de.
Dirk SchülerDept. Microbiology, University of Bayreuth D-95447 Bayreuth Germany dirk.schueler@uni-bayreuth.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-0762
Joachim H ClementDept. Hematology and Medical Oncology, Jena University Hospital D-07747 Jena Germany joachim.clement@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6601-2456
Palmetto Hematology Oncology · USUniversity of Bayreuth · DEElectron (Ukraine) · UAJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetosomes represent biogenic, magnetic nanoparticles biosynthesized by magnetotactic bacteria. Subtle biological control on each step of biomineralization generates core-shell nanoparticles of high crystallinity, strong magnetization and uniform shape and size. These features make magnetosomes a promising alternative to chemically synthesized nanoparticles for many applications in the biotechnological and biomedical field, such as their usage as biosensors in medical diagnostics, as drug-delivery agents, or as contrast agents for magnetic imaging techniques. Thereby, the particles are directly applied to mammalian cells or even injected into the body. In the present work, we provide a comprehensive characterization of isolated magnetosomes as potential cytotoxic effects and particle uptake have not been well studied so far. Different cell lines including cancer cells and primary cells are incubated with increasing particle amounts, and effects on cell viability are investigated. Obtained data suggest a concentration-dependent biocompatibility of isolated magnetosomes for all tested cell lines. Furthermore, magnetosome accumulation in endolysosomal structures around the nuclei is observed. Proliferation rates are affected in the presence of increasing particle amounts; however, viability is not affected and doubling times can be restored by reducing the magnetosome concentration. In addition, we evidence magnetosome-cell interactions that are strong enough to allow for magnetic cell sorting. Overall, our study not only assesses the biocompatibility of isolated magnetosomes, but also evaluates effects on cell proliferation and the fate of internalized magnetosomes, thereby providing prerequisites for their future

Identifiers

PMID34263139
PMCPMC8243654
OpenAlexW3164643380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.