ArticleJournal of second language pronunciation2018
Computer-Assisted Visual Articulation Feedback in L2 Pronunciation Instruction: A Review.
Article in Journal of second language pronunciation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of speech perception following articulatory-target based production training for second language acquisition.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Mirrors and toothaches: commonplace manipulations of non-auditory feedback availability change perceived speech intelligibility.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Effects of Ultrasound Familiarization on Production and Perception of Nonnative Contrasts.Phonetica · 2020Article
- Individual predictors of response to biofeedback training for second-language production.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Can perceptual training alter the effect of visual biofeedback in speech-motor learning?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Prior Pronunciation Knowledge Bootstraps Word Learning.Frontiers in communication · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language learning is a multimodal endeavor; to improve their pronunciation in a new language, learners access not only auditory information about speech sounds and patterns, but also visual information about articulatory movements and processes. With the development of new technologies in computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) come new possibilities for delivering feedback in both auditory and visual modalities. The present paper surveys the literature on computer-assisted visual articulation feedback, including direct feedback that provides visual models of articulation and indirect feedback that uses visualized acoustic information as a means to inform articulation instruction. Our focus is explicitly on segmental features rather than suprasegmental ones, with visual feedback conceived of as providing visualizations of articulatory configurations, movements, and processes. In addition to discussing types of visual articulation feedback, we also consider the criteria for effective delivery of feedback, and methods of evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.