Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262842›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021

Comparison of Complication Risk for Open Carpal Tunnel Release: In-office versus Operating Room Settings.

Dustin J Randall, Kate Peacock, Katelin B Nickel, Margaret Olsen, Andrew R Tyser, Nikolas H Kazmers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. From wide awake surgery to office surgery.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dustin J RandallOakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Mich.
Kate PeacockInstitute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Center for Administrative Data Research (CADR), Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo.
Katelin B NickelInstitute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Center for Administrative Data Research (CADR), Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo.
Margaret OlsenInstitute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Center for Administrative Data Research (CADR), Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo.
Andrew R TyserDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Nikolas H KazmersDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
University of Utah · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
AHRQ HHS R24 HS019455NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerforming open carpal tunnel release (oCTR) in an office-based procedure room setting (PR) decreases surgical costs when compared with the operating room (OR). However, it is unclear if the risk of major medical, wound, and iatrogenic complications differ between settings. Our purpose was to compare the risk of major medical complications associated with oCTR between PR and OR settings.

methodsUtilizing the MarketScan Database, we identified adults undergoing isolated oCTR between 2006 and 2015 performed in PR and OR settings. ICD-9-CM and/or CPT codes were used to identify major medical complications, surgical site complications, and iatrogenic complications within 90 days of oCTR. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare complication risk between groups.

resultsOf the 2134 PR and 76,216 OR cases, the risk of major medical complications was 0.89% (19/2134) and 1.20% (914/76,216), respectively, with no difference observed in the multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.84; 95% CI 0.53-1.33;

conclusionThese results support a similar safety profile for both the PR and OR surgical settings following oCTR with similar pooled major medical complications, pooled wound/surgical site complications, and iatrogenic complications.

Identifiers

PMID34262842
PMCPMC8274797
OpenAlexW3182207360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.