Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262600›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2021

Targeted Therapies in Axial Psoriatic Arthritis.

Alberto Floris, Mattia Congia, Elisabetta Chessa, Maria Maddalena Angioni, Matteo Piga, Alberto Cauli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto FlorisUnità Operativa Complessa di Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Sanità Pubblica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria e Università di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.
Mattia CongiaUnità Operativa Complessa di Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Sanità Pubblica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria e Università di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.
Elisabetta ChessaUnità Operativa Complessa di Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Sanità Pubblica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria e Università di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.
Maria Maddalena AngioniUnità Operativa Complessa di Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Sanità Pubblica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria e Università di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.
Matteo PigaUnità Operativa Complessa di Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Sanità Pubblica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria e Università di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.
Alberto CauliUnità Operativa Complessa di Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Sanità Pubblica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria e Università di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Cagliari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific and high-quality evidence on the efficacy of the current targeted therapies for axial disease in psoriatic arthritis (axPsA) is still scarce. Indeed, almost all the cohorts investigated in clinical trials on PsA consisted of patients with peripheral arthritis, where a small number of them also had axial involvement. Only one randomized controlled trial was so far specifically designed to assess the efficacy of a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) in axPsA. For other biological and synthetic targeted DMARDs, the most specific evidence for treatment in axPsA is extrapolated from

Indexed as

axial psoriatic arthritispsoriatic arthritisspondylarthritistargeted therapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID34262600
PMCPMC8273289
OpenAlexW3176820843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.