Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262474›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2021

Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Isabela Roque Marçal, Karla Fabiana Goessler, Roselien Buys, Juliano Casonatto, Emmanuel Gomes Ciolac, Véronique A Cornelissen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Physical Activity and Hypertension.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabela Roque MarçalExercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, Brazil.
Karla Fabiana GoesslerApplied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Medicine (FMUSP), University of Saõ Paulo, Saõ Paulo, Brazil.
Roselien BuysResearch Group for Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Juliano CasonattoResearch Group in Physiology and Physical Activity, University of Northern Paraná, Londrina, Brazil.
Emmanuel Gomes CiolacExercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, Brazil.
Véronique A CornelissenResearch Group for Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Norte do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ambulatory blood pressurehigh intensity interval exercisehypotensionmoderate intensity aerobic exerciseoffice blood pressurepost-exercicesystematic review & meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID34262474
PMCPMC8274970
OpenAlexW3173823843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.