ArticleFood & nutrition research2021
Effect of
Article in Food & nutrition research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Ginseng Berry Extract (SIRTBERRY™) in Treating Andropause Symptoms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
- Review
- Effect ofWorld journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Two Sides of the Same Coin for Health: Adaptogenic Botanicals as Nutraceuticals for Nutrition and Pharmaceuticals in Medicine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effect of Elderberry (Nutrients · 2024Article
- Eurycomanone fromJournal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2024Article
- Eurycoma longifolia (Tongkat Ali) supplementation enhances sleep and wake consolidation in wild-type, but not in narcoleptic mice.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024Article
- Article
- A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Comparative Human Study to Verify the Functionality and Safety of the Lespedeza cuneata G. Don Extract for the Improvement of Aging Male Syndrome.Urology research & practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow testosterone levels cause physiological changes that compromise the quality of life in ageing men. A standardised water extract from the root of
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of Physta
designThis randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled 105 male subjects aged 50-70 years with a testosterone level <300 ng/dL, BMI ≥ 18 and ≤30.0 kg/m
resultsThere was a significant increase in the total testosterone levels at week 12 (
conclusionSupplementation of Physta
trial registrationThis clinical study has been registered in ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2019/03/017959).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.