Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262395›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology2021

Ovarian tissue grafting: Lessons learnt from our experience with 55 grafts.

Genia Rozen, Stephanie Sii, Franca Agresta, Debra Gook, Alex Polyakov, Catharyn Stern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Genia RozenReproductive Services Unit Royal Women's Hospital Parkville, Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Stephanie SiiReproductive Services Unit Royal Women's Hospital Parkville, Melbourne Vic. Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3020-6985
Franca AgrestaReproductive Services Unit Royal Women's Hospital Parkville, Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Debra GookReproductive Services Unit Royal Women's Hospital Parkville, Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Alex PolyakovReproductive Services Unit Royal Women's Hospital Parkville, Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Catharyn SternReproductive Services Unit Royal Women's Hospital Parkville, Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Royal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Uncertainties remain regarding the clinical efficacy of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and grafting. We report a retrospective analysis of reproductive outcomes and lessons learnt following 55 ovarian tissue transplant procedures at our center from 2006 to 2019. Methods: We analyzed variables related to graft success such as tissue volume, follicular density, total follicular volume, and age on the duration of graft function. Results: Follicular density and total follicular volume correlate positively with duration of graft function. All clinical pregnancies in our cohort occurred in women who were aged 35 or less at the time of ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Conclusion: Graft success, as determined by eventual pregnancy and the longevity of graft function, may be impacted by factors including age at cryopreservation, follicular density, and total follicular volume.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologycryopreservation of germ cellsendocrinologyfertility of femaleoncology

Identifiers

PMID34262395
PMCPMC8254169
OpenAlexW3163810874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.