Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262346›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2021

Evaluation of Hybrid PET/MRI for Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) Delineation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Radiotherapy.

Yan-Nan Zhang, Xin Lu, Zhen-Guo Lu, Li-Ping Fu, Jun Zhao, Zuo-Lin Xiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The use of PET/MRI in radiotherapy.Insights into imaging · 2024
    Review
  3. Gross tumor volume delineation in primary prostate cancer onCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan-Nan Zhang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xin Lu *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Guo LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Li-Ping FuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jun ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zuo-Lin XiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shanghai East Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHybrid PET/MRI has been increasingly incorporated into the practice of radiation oncologists since it contains both anatomical and biological data and may bring about personalized radiation plans for each patient. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of GTV delineation from hybrid PET/MRI compared with that from current-practice MRI during radiotherapy planning in patients with colorectal liver metastases. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwenty-four patients (thirty lesions) with colorectal liver metastases were prospectively enrolled in this study. Three physicians delineated the target volume with the most popular delineating methods-the visual method. First of all, differences among the three observers were assessed. The difference and correlation of GTV values obtained by MRI, PET, and hybrid PET/MRI were subjected to statistical analysis afterwards. Finally, the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated to assess the spatial overlap. Based on the value of DSC, we also evaluate the correlation between DSC and tumor size. GTV-MRI was set as a reference.

resultsThere was no significant difference among observers in GTV-MRI (

conclusionWith the database used, there is good agreement among observers. Hybrid PET/MRI in colorectal liver metastases radiotherapy may affect the GTV delineation. Moreover, the overlap degree between GTV-MRI and GTV-PET/MRI is higher and increases with volume.

Indexed as

colorectal liver metastasesgross tumor volumehybrid PET/MRIradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34262346
PMCPMC8275048
OpenAlexW3178269352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.