ArticleCancer management and research2021
The Clinical Value of Computed Tomography (CT)-Guided
Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- I-125 seeds with chemotherapy for progressive non-small-cell lung cancer after first-line treatment: a meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluation of risk factors for difficult-to-control pain (VAS score > 3) at two months after late-stage non-small cell lung cancer treatment with iodine-125 radioactive particle implantation combined with chemotherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2025Article
- Dose and local efficacy analysis of iodine-125 seed implantation therapy for lung tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Recent progress in radioactive seed implantation brachytherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Making waves: how ultrasound-targeted drug delivery is changing pharmaceutical approaches.Materials advances · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo further evaluate the efficacy and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine 125 (
methodsThis study obtained written consent from all patients and was approved by our institution. From January 2006 to June 2018, 210 NSCLC patients (progression of first-line CCRT) were retrospectively recruited and then divided into two groups. A total of 116 patients were given CT-guided
resultsIn group A, local response rate (LRR) within 3 years was significantly better (P<0.05). Mean survival time [progression-free survival time (PFST) and overall survival (OS)] was 15.1±1.4 months and 21.2±1.6 months in group A compared with 10.0±1.4 months and 16.2±1.7 months in group B (PFST: P<0.01, HR=1.472, 95% CI 1.097-1.975; OS: P = 0.036, HR=1.342, 95% CI 1.005-1.791). Tumor size and No. of first cycle chemotherapy were independent factors that affected survival, ≤3cm largest tumor diameter and more than 4 first cycles of chemotherapy showed longer PFST and OS (P<0.05). Tumor-related clinical symptoms were relieved in group A (P<0.01). No serious complications occurred in the two groups.
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.