Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262293›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2021

A Comparative Study of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Combined with Double

Zhaonan Li, Dechao Jiao, Xinwei Han, Zaoqu Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Safety and efficacy of self-expandable metallic stent combined withCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Self-expandable metallic stent withAnnals of translational medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhaonan Li *Department of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3055-8817
Dechao Jiao *Department of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5055-4672
Xinwei HanDepartment of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4460-8619
Zaoqu LiuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0452-742X
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMs) with a novel brachytherapy biliary drainage catheter (BBDC, double

methodsFrom September 2016 to December 2018, we retrospectively enrolled patients with biliary stent implantation after receiving either BBDC loaded with

resultsThe success rate of interventional therapy in both groups was 100%, and all patients with MOJ were alleviated. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.02), the grade 3 or 4 complications in the BBDC group and in the control group were 6/34 (17.65%) and 7/39 (17.95%), respectively (

conclusionThis interim analysis showed that BBDC (double-stranded irradiation) can prolong the stent patency time compared with

Indexed as

brachytherapycholangiocarcinomajaundicerestenosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID34262293
PMCPMC8274321
OpenAlexW3180021982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.