Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2021
Assessing Palatability of a New Amphetamine Extended-Release Tablet Formulation for the Treatment of ADHD.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectiveADHD is, for many people, a lifelong disease that requires chronic medication use. Stimulant therapy is often recommended as first-line treatment for ADHD. Adherence to stimulant treatment among patients diagnosed with ADHD is poor. Major regulatory agencies have recommended measurement of palatability for new tablet formulations. A new amphetamine extended-release tablet (AMPH ER TAB) for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was developed. The AMPH ER TAB has a bubblegum flavor and can be chewed or swallowed whole. In 2016, the FDA developed a draft guidance document on the topic of chewable drug tablet formulation palatability.
methodsA palatability study of the AMPH ER TAB using the 2016 FDA guidance was conducted. Subjects were asked to assess the taste, aftertaste, and mouthfeel of the tablet formulation using a short questionnaire. Scores from the questionnaire were rated and presented.
resultsThe substudy assessed 35 subjects with a mean age of 38 (±11) years. Subjects were predominantly male, non-Hispanic, and White. Most subjects rated the oral sensation/mouth feel and taste of the tablet as positive (pleasant to very pleasant) (70.1% and 83.6%, respectively). Additionally, 86.6% of the subjects rated the strength of the taste as neutral (moderate taste) or positive (mild to no taste). Finally, 82.1% of all subjects rated the aftertaste as positive (pleasant to very pleasant) and 92.5% of subjects rated the strength of the aftertaste as neutral or positive (mild to no taste). The trends in evaluation scores for each question were similar regardless of whether the ER chewable tablet was administered under fasted or fed conditions.
conclusionThe positive palatability data presented here will be useful for future "real-world" assessments of adherence to treatment with the AMPH ER TAB. Enhanced adherence may bolster the argument that taste, mouthfeel, and aftertaste are critical determinants of treatment adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.