ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2021
Toric Implantable Collamer Lens for the Treatment of Myopic Astigmatism.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rotational stability and visual outcomes of toric implantable collamer lenses in eyes with horizontal and non-horizontal implanting orientation: an observational study.International ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Implantable collamer lens combined with femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy and toric implantable collamer lens for high myopia with moderate-to-low astigmatism corrections: a comparative study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Outcomes of Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery Performed by Fellows and Consultants in a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Retrospective Validation of an AI Based Tool for Vault Prediction After Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery for High Myopia.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Toric versus Standard Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation for Low Myopic Astigmatism: A 12-Month Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- [Toric-ICL shows better predictability and efficacy than FS-LASIK for myopia correction in patients with moderate to high myopia and astigmatism].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- One-stage versus two-stage bilateral implantable collamer lens implantation: a comparison of efficacy and safety.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Refractive outcomes after V4c Toric collamer lens implantation over 1y of follow-up.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- From inception to innovation: bibliometric analysis of the evolution, hotspots, and trends in implantable collamer lens surgery research.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis of EVO/EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lens: Evaluating Refractive Outcomes in the Largest Single Center Study of ICL Patients in the United States.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens with a Central Hole Implantation: Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Outcomes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Vault differences in eyes implanted with spherical and toric implantable collamer lenses: an inter-eye analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Analysis of perioperative problems related to intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation.International ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Clinical Outcomes and Astigmatism Vector Analysis of High Toricity Visian ICL.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report visual outcomes following surgical correction of myopic astigmatism with Visian Toric implantable collamer lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, CA, USA) at a single tertiary refractive center in the United States. PATIENTS AND
methodsToric ICL was implanted in 96 eyes (55 patients) with mean preoperative sphere of -8.98 ± 3.04 diopters (D) and cylinder of -2.67 ± 1.02 D from December 2018 to February 2021. Primary visual outcomes of efficacy, safety, stability, predictability of refractive correction, and astigmatic analysis were reported at three and twelve months postoperatively. Secondary subjective outcomes included patient-reported dry eye symptoms and glare/halos at postoperative visits. Other secondary outcomes were biometric data and postoperative vault over time.
resultsAt three and twelve months, 75 and 46 eyes were evaluated, respectively. At twelve months, the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -0.23 ± 0.47 D with 93% achieving within ±1.00 D of target refraction. The manifest refractive cylinder (MRC) at twelve months was -0.73 ± 0.51 D, with 86% within ±1.00 D of target. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/20 or better in 74% of eyes at twelve months. No patients lost ≥2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at twelve months. The mean angle of error was -0.9 ± 10.2° at three months and -1.6 ± 12.8° at twelve months. One patient required bilateral lens rotation, four patients underwent secondary enhancement with LASIK/PRK, and seven patients underwent postoperative limbal relaxing incisions.
conclusionThis initial single-site experience finds Toric ICL implantation for myopic astigmatism to be safe and effective. Patients can achieve markedly improved UDVA in a single surgery with stable vision over time and minimal adverse subjective symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.