Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262233›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2021

Bayesian Joint Modeling of Multiple Brain Functional Networks.

Joshua Lukemire, Suprateek Kundu, Giuseppe Pagnoni, Ying Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. DEEP DAG LEARNING OF EFFECTIVE BRAIN CONNECTIVITY FOR FMRI ANALYSIS.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Expectation Conditional Maximization approach for Gaussian graphical models.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua LukemireDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, USA.
Suprateek KunduDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, USA.
Giuseppe PagnoniDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Ying GuoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, USA.

Funding

Statistical ICA Methods for Analysis & Integration of Multi-dimensional Data Diversity SupplementR01MH105561 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, KANG, JIAN · 2014 to 2024
$4.3M
Statistical Modeling of Alzheimer's Disease Progression Integrating Brain Imaging and -Omics DataR01AG071174 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KUNDU, SUPRATEEK, LONG, QI · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Complex, Multi-dimensional Data from Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Mental Health StudiesR01MH118771 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, MANATUNGA, AMITA K. · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Method Development of Agreement Measures and Applications in Mental HealthR01MH079448 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, MANATUNGA, AMITA K. · 2008 to 2016
$2.2M
Integrative Brain Network-Based Analysis for Heterogeneous and Multimodal Neuroimaging DataR01MH120299 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KUNDU, SUPRATEEK · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071174NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079448NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118771NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating the similarity and changes in brain networks under different mental conditions has become increasingly important in neuroscience research. A standard separate estimation strategy fails to pool information across networks and hence has reduced estimation accuracy and power to detect between-network differences. Motivated by a fMRI Stroop task experiment that involves multiple related tasks, we develop an integrative Bayesian approach for jointly modeling multiple brain networks that provides a systematic inferential framework for network comparisons. The proposed approach explicitly models shared and differential patterns via flexible Dirichlet process-based priors on edge probabilities. Conditional on edges, the connection strengths are modeled via Bayesian spike and slab prior on the precision matrix off-diagonals. Numerical simulations illustrate that the proposed approach has increased power to detect true differential edges while providing adequate control on false positives and achieves greater network estimation accuracy compared to existing methods. The Stroop task data analysis reveals greater connectivity differences between task and fixation that are concentrated in brain regions previously identified as differentially activated in Stroop task, and more nuanced connectivity differences between exertion and relaxed task. In contrast, penalized modeling approaches involving computationally burdensome permutation tests reveal negligible network differences between conditions that seem biologically implausible.

Indexed as

Brain networksDirichlet processmultiple graphical modelsspike and slab priorStroop task

Identifiers

PMID34262233
PMCPMC8274571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.