Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262150›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2021

The gut microbiome: what the oncologist ought to know.

K A Lee, M K Luong, H Shaw, P Nathan, V Bataille, T D Spector

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07607548 (A 8-week, Randomized, Double-blind, and Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Proinflammatory Mechanisms Induced by Systemic Treatment in Women With Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07607548 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A 8-week, Randomized, Double-blind, and Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Proinflammatory Mechanisms Induced by Systemic Treatment in Women With Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoznan University of Medical SciencesRan2022 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsBreast Cancer, Probiotic TherapyArmsProbiotic, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Functional evaluation of synbiotic combination ofCurrent research in food science · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

K A Lee *Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK. karla.lee@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5904-5586
M K Luong *Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's & St Thomas Hospital, London, UK.
H ShawDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
P NathanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
V BatailleDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
T D SpectorDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBGuy's Hospital · GBMount Vernon Hospital · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N01183X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome (GM) has been implicated in a vast number of human pathologies and has become a focus of oncology research over the past 5 years. The normal gut microbiota imparts specific function in host nutrient metabolism, xenobiotic and drug metabolism, maintenance of structural integrity of the gut mucosal barrier, immunomodulation and protection against pathogens. Strong evidence is emerging to support the effects of the GM on the development of some malignancies but also on responses to cancer therapies, most notably, immune checkpoint inhibition. Tools for manipulating the GM including dietary modification, probiotics and faecal microbiota transfer (FMT) are in development. Current understandings of the many complex interrelationships between the GM, cancer, the immune system, nutrition and medication are ultimately based on a combination of short-term clinical trials and observational studies, paired with an ever-evolving understanding of cancer biology. The next generation of personalised cancer therapies focusses on molecular and phenotypic heterogeneity, tumour evolution and immune status; it is distinctly possible that the GM will become an increasingly central focus amongst them. The aim of this review is to provide clinicians with an overview of microbiome science and our current understanding of the role the GM plays in cancer.

Indexed as

BacteriaDiet TherapyFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineProbioticsTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34262150
PMCPMC8548300
OpenAlexW3178609592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.