ArticleSpinal cord2022
Adults with spina bifida: ambulatory performance and cognitive capacity in relation to muscle function.
Article in Spinal cord, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Memory in Spina Bifida, from Childhood to Adulthood: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Establishing Content Validity Evidence of the Pittsburgh Impairment Testing Tool (PITT) for Adults With Spina Bifida.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
objectiveDescribe and compare ambulatory performance and cognitive capacity in relation to muscle function in an adult cohort with spina bifida. Also, explore factors associated with ambulation in participants with muscle function level 3.
settingSpecialist clinic for adults with spinal cord disorders in Stockholm, Sweden.
methodsA total regional cohort of adults (n = 219) with spina bifida was invited, 196 (104 women, mean age 35 years, SD 13 years) participated. Mode of mobility, cognitive capacity and muscle function were investigated. For participants with muscle function level 3, factors associated with ambulation were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
resultsIn all, 84 participants (42%) were community ambulators, 22 (12%) household ambulators and 90 (46%) wheelchair users. There was a linear association between the lower degree of muscle function and scoliosis (P < 0.001). Mode of mobility varied despite similar muscle prerequisites in participants with muscle function level 3 (n = 58). Factors associated with ambulation in participants with muscle function level 3 were the absence of scoliosis, lower BMI and higher cognitive capacity.
conclusionsCognitive capacity and mode of mobility varied widely across the cohort. However, in participants with muscle function level 3, despite similar muscular prerequisites, a large variation in the mode of mobility was found, suggesting that other factors were involved. It is important to prevent scoliosis, support a healthy lifestyle, as well as offer cognitive screening and support to promote ambulatory function and optimise independence in the everyday lives of adults with spina bifida.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.