Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262090›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Maximal modularity and the optimal size of parliaments.

Luca Gamberi, Yanik-Pascal Förster, Evan Tzanis, Alessia Annibale, Pierpaolo Vivo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca GamberiDepartment of Mathematics and Quantitative and Digital Law Lab, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Yanik-Pascal FörsterDepartment of Mathematics and Quantitative and Digital Law Lab, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Evan TzanisDepartment of Mathematics and Quantitative and Digital Law Lab, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Alessia AnnibaleDepartment of Mathematics and Quantitative and Digital Law Lab, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Pierpaolo VivoDepartment of Mathematics and Quantitative and Digital Law Lab, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK. pierpaolo.vivo@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S03174X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important question in representative democracies is how to determine the optimal parliament size of a given country. According to an old conjecture, known as the cubic root law, there is a fairly universal power-law relation, with an exponent equal to 1/3, between the size of an elected parliament and the country's population. Empirical data in modern European countries support such universality but are consistent with a larger exponent. In this work, we analyse this intriguing regularity using tools from complex networks theory. We model the population of a democratic country as a random network, drawn from a growth model, where each node is assigned a constituency membership sampled from an available set of size D. We calculate analytically the modularity of the population and find that its functional relation with the number of constituencies is strongly non-monotonic, exhibiting a maximum that depends on the population size. The criterion of maximal modularity allows us to predict that the number of representatives should scale as a power-law in the size of the population, a finding that is qualitatively confirmed by the empirical analysis of real-world data.

Identifiers

PMID34262090
PMCPMC8280170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.