Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34262066›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Unveiling the third dimension in morphometry with automated quantitative volumetric computations.

Lawrence R Frank, Timothy B Rowe, Doug M Boyer, Lawrence M Witmer, Vitaly L Galinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lawrence R FrankInstitute for Engineering in Medicine, Center for Scientific Computation in Imaging, University of California San Diego, 8950 Villa La Jolla Dr., Suite B227, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. lfrank@ucsd.edu.
Timothy B RoweDepartment of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Doug M BoyerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lawrence M WitmerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Vitaly L GalinskyInstitute for Engineering in Medicine, Center for Scientific Computation in Imaging, University of California San Diego, 8950 Villa La Jolla Dr., Suite B227, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.

Funding

New Quantitative Neuroimaging Metrics of Structural and Functional Connectivity of the Locus Coeruleus as a Novel Biomarker of Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis and ProgressionR01AG054049 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BONDI, MARK W, FRANK, LAWRENCE R · 2017 to 2021
$4.1M
Diffusion Imaging in Gray MatterR01MH096100 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FRANK, LAWRENCE R · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054049NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As computed tomography and related technologies have become mainstream tools across a broad range of scientific applications, each new generation of instrumentation produces larger volumes of more-complex 3D data. Lagging behind are step-wise improvements in computational methods to rapidly analyze these new large, complex datasets. Here we describe novel computational methods to capture and quantify volumetric information, and to efficiently characterize and compare shape volumes. It is based on innovative theoretical and computational reformulation of volumetric computing. It consists of two theoretical constructs and their numerical implementation: the spherical wave decomposition (SWD), that provides fast, accurate automated characterization of shapes embedded within complex 3D datasets; and symplectomorphic registration with phase space regularization by entropy spectrum pathways (SYMREG), that is a non-linear volumetric registration method that allows homologous structures to be correctly warped to each other or a common template for comparison. Together, these constitute the Shape Analysis for Phenomics from Imaging Data (SAPID) method. We demonstrate its ability to automatically provide rapid quantitative segmentation and characterization of single unique datasets, and both inter-and intra-specific comparative analyses. We go beyond pairwise comparisons and analyze collections of samples from 3D data repositories, highlighting the magnified potential our method has when applied to data collections. We discuss the potential of SAPID in the broader context of generating normative morphologies required for meaningfully quantifying and comparing variations in complex 3D anatomical structures and systems.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID34262066
PMCPMC8280169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.