ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2021
Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: A single-institute experience.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endocrine paraneoplastic syndromes in lung cancer: A call for clinical vigilance (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Feasibility of Early Surgical Treatment for Adolescent Patients with Prolactinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Article
- Implementation of functional imaging usingPituitary · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDopamine agonists such as bromocriptine and cabergoline have been found to be an effective treatment for hyperprolactinemia, not only inducing adenoma shrinkage but also lowering serum prolactin levels. Among known dopamine agonists, cabergoline is the drug of choice due to its enhanced tolerability compared with bromocriptine. This study aimed to evaluate cabergoline's effectiveness, along with transsphenoidal surgery, in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia.
methodsWe retrieved all patients with a diagnosis of prolactinoma who were treated in our hospital during 2000-2018. A total of 208 patients were enrolled in the analysis after applying exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into four groups according to the treatments received. The demographic data, dosage and duration of cabergoline, and serum prolactin levels at different time points were collected for analysis.
resultsNormalization was achieved in 59 patients (83.10%) within a short median duration of 2.80 months among those treated with cabergoline only. Although cabergoline alone was effective and well-tolerated, our data showed that long-term remission rates were more favorable when surgery was involved. The long-term remission rate of all patients enrolled was 53.8% (112 patients among 208 patients). The long-term remission rates for the different treatment groups were 17.8% (8 of 45 patients) in Group 1 (Operation→Drug), 83.3% (5 of 6 patients) in Group 2 (Drug→Operation), 79.0% (68 of 86 patients) in Group 3 (Operation only), and 43.7% (31 of 71 patients) in Group 4 (Drug only).
conclusionCabergoline has been demonstrated to be effective and should be considered as a first-line treatment for hyperprolactinemia. In our study, transsphenoidal surgery was also demonstrated to achieve good results compared with medical treatment. Surgical intervention may resurface as an alternative first-line treatment. When used in combination with cabergoline, surgery offers a higher disease remission rate than either drug or operation alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.