ArticleEar and hearing
Listening Difficulties in Children With Normal Audiograms: Relation to Hearing and Cognition.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Listening Difficulties in Children Initially Presenting with Speech Sound Disorder: Two Case Reports.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Reduced neural speech tracking in adolescents with listening difficulty.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Listening performance in background noise and subjective hearing: a comparison among young adults, older adults, and adults with listening difficulties.Journal of otology · 2026Article
- Structural and pragmatic language skills in school-age children relate to resting state functional connectivity.Brain imaging and behavior · 2025Article
- Validating the directional command flanker task: An auditory analog of the arrows flanker.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Cortical connectivity in speech and sensory networks associated with childrens' listening and attention disorders.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary Clinical Assessment and Interventions for Childhood Listening Difficulty and Auditory Processing Disorder: Relation Between Research Findings and Clinical Practice.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Traits of Developmental Disorders in Adults With Listening Difficulties Without Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder And/or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Utility of a Questionnaire Short Form for Adolescents with Listening Difficulties in Japan.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Detection of mild sensory hearing loss using a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Amplitude Modulation Perception and Cortical Evoked Potentials in Children With Listening Difficulties and Their Typically Developing Peers.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Listening and Processing Skills in Young School Children with a History of Developmental Phonological Disorder.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predictive brain activity related to auditory information is associated with performance in speech comprehension tasks in noisy environments.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Brainstem auditory physiology in children with listening difficultiesHearing research · 2023Article
- Assessing Auditory Processing in Children with Listening Difficulties: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Speech-in-noise testing: Innovative applications for pediatric patients, underrepresented populations, fitness for duty, clinical trials, and remote services.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Review
- Speech cortical activation and connectivity in typically developing children and those with listening difficulties.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- Hearing thresholds elevation and potential association with emotional problems among 1,914 children in Beijing, China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesChildren presenting at audiology services with caregiver-reported listening difficulties often have normal audiograms. The appropriate approach for the further assessment and clinical management of these children is currently unclear. In this Sensitive Indicators of Childhood Listening Difficulties (SICLiD) study, we assessed listening ability using a reliable and validated caregiver questionnaire (the Evaluation of Children's Listening and Processing Skills [ECLiPS]) in a large (n = 146) and heterogeneous sample of 6- to 13-year-old children with normal audiograms. Scores on the ECLiPS were related to a multifaceted laboratory assessment of the children's audiological, psycho- and physiological-acoustic, and cognitive abilities. This report is an overview of the SICLiD study and focuses on the children's behavioral performance. The overall goals of SICLiD were to understand the auditory and other neural mechanisms underlying childhood listening difficulties and translate that understanding into clinical assessment and, ultimately, intervention.
designCross-sectional behavioral assessment of children with "listening difficulties" and an age-matched "typically developing" control group. Caregivers completed the ECLiPS, and the resulting total standardized composite score formed the basis of further descriptive statistics, univariate, and multivariate modeling of experimental data.
resultsAll scores of the ECLiPS, the SCAN-3:C, a standardized clinical test suite for auditory processing, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cognition Toolbox were significantly lower for children with listening difficulties than for their typically developing peers using group comparisons via t-tests and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests. A similar effect was observed on the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences (LiSN-S) test for speech sentence-in-noise intelligibility but only reached significance for the Low Cue and High Cue conditions and the Talker Advantage derived score. Stepwise regression to examine the factors contributing to the ECLiPS Total scaled score (pooled across groups) yielded a model that explained 42% of its variance based on the SCAN-3:C composite, LiSN-S Talker Advantage, and the NIH Toolbox Picture Vocabulary, and Dimensional Change Card Sorting scores (F[4, 95] = 17.35, p < 0.001). High correlations were observed between many test scores including the ECLiPS, SCAN-3:C, and NIH Toolbox composite measures. LiSN-S Advantage measures generally correlated weakly and nonsignificantly with non-LiSN-S measures. However, a significant interaction was found between extended high-frequency threshold and LiSN-S Talker Advantage.
conclusionsChildren with listening difficulties but normal audiograms have problems with the cognitive processing of auditory and nonauditory stimuli that include both fluid and crystallized reasoning. Analysis of poor performance on the LiSN-S Talker Advantage measure identified subclinical hearing loss as a minor contributing factor to talker segregation. Beyond auditory tests, evaluations of children with complaints of listening difficulties should include standardized caregiver observations and consideration of broad cognitive abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.