Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261810›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2021

Teaching Parents to Be Responsive: A Network Meta-analysis.

Nina Sokolovic, Michelle Rodrigues, Andrea C Tricco, Roksana Dobrina, Jennifer M Jenkins

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nina SokolovicDepartment of Applied Psychology and Human Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; nina.sokolovic@mail.utoronto.ca.
Michelle RodriguesDepartment of Applied Psychology and Human Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Andrea C TriccoLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; and.
Roksana DobrinaDepartment of Applied Psychology and Human Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Jennifer M JenkinsDepartment of Applied Psychology and Human Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
University of Toronto · CAUnity Health Toronto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextChildren who receive more responsive care during their early childhood tend to exhibit stronger cognitive development, mental well-being, and physical health across their life course.

objectiveDetermine how to design effective responsivity training programs for caregivers. DATA SOURCES: We searched seven electronic databases through October 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials ( DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Data were pooled by using random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses.

resultsPrograms had, on average, a medium effect ( LIMITATIONS: Most samples included only mothers from Western countries and lacked follow-up data.

conclusionsHaving parents observe examples of responsive caregiving and complete home-practice in short, focused programs may be an effective, scalable approach to enhancing responsivity in the general population and reducing inequalities in child development.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantParents

Identifiers

PMID34261810
OpenAlexW3181387473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.