ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021
In vitro affinity maturation of broader and more-potent variants of the HIV-1-neutralizing antibody CAP256-VRC26.25.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolution of display technologies for antibody drug discovery.Trends in biotechnology · 2026Review
- High-throughput specificity profiling of antibody libraries using ribosome display and microfluidics.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- In vivo affinity maturation of the CD4 domains of an HIV-1-entry inhibitor.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- In vivo affinity maturation of mouse B cells reprogrammed to express human antibodies.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Affinity maturation of CRISPR-engineered B cell receptors in vivo.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Article
- Heavy-chain CDR3-engineered B cells facilitate in vivo evaluation of HIV-1 vaccine candidates.Immunity · 2023Article
- Bispecific antibody CAP256.J3LS targets V2-apex and CD4-binding sites with high breadth and potency.mAbsArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Three variable 2 (V2) loops of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimer converge at the Env apex to form the epitope of an important classes of HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). These V2-glycan/apex antibodies are exceptionally potent but less broad (∼60 to 75%) than many other bNAbs. Their CDRH3 regions are typically long, acidic, and tyrosine sulfated. Tyrosine sulfation complicates efforts to improve these antibodies through techniques such as phage or yeast display. To improve the breadth of CAP256-VRC26.25 (VRC26.25), a very potent apex antibody, we adapted and extended a B cell display approach. Specifically, we used CRISPR/Cas12a to introduce VRC26.25 heavy- and light-chain genes into their respective loci in a B cell line, ensuring that each cell expresses a single VRC26.25 variant. We then diversified these loci through activation-induced cytidine deaminase-mediated hypermutation and homology-directed repair using randomized CDRH3 sequences as templates. Iterative sorting with soluble Env trimers and further randomization selected VRC26.25 variants with successively improving affinities. Three mutations in the CDRH3 region largely accounted for this improved affinity, and VRC26.25 modified with these mutations exhibited greater breadth and potency than the original antibody. Our data describe a broader and more-potent form of VRC26.25 as well as an approach useful for improving the breadth and potency of antibodies with functionally important posttranslational modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.