Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261779›Full record

Trial reportOpen heart2021

Cardiac rehabilitation patients experiences and understanding of group metacognitive therapy: a qualitative study.

Rebecca McPhillips, Lora Capobianco, Bethany Grace Cooper, Zara Husain, Adrian Wells

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open heart, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca McPhillipsSocial Care and Society, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK rebecca.mcphillips@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4296-5970
Lora CapobiancoResearch and Innovation, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Bethany Grace CooperResearch and Innovation, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Zara HusainResearch and Innovation, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Adrian WellsResearch and Innovation, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDepression and anxiety are up to three times more prevalent in cardiac patients than the general population and are linked to increased risks of future cardiac events and mortality. Psychological interventions for cardiac patients vary in content and are often associated with weak outcomes. A recent treatment, metacognitive therapy (MCT) has been shown to be highly effective at treating psychological distress in mental health settings. This is the first study to explore qualitatively, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients' experiences and understanding of group MCT with the aim of examining aspects of treatment that patients experienced as helpful.

methodsIn-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 purposively sampled CR patients following group MCT. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsTwo main themes were identified: (1) general therapy factors that were seen largely as beneficial, where patients highlighted interaction with other CR patients and CR staff delivery of treatment and their knowledge of cardiology; (2) group MCT-specific factors that were seen as beneficial encompassed patients' understanding of the intervention and use of particular group MCT techniques. Most patients viewed MCT in a manner consistent with the metacognitive model. All the patients who completed group MCT were positive about it and described self-perceived changes in their thinking and well-being. A minority of patients gave specific reasons for not finding the treatment helpful.

conclusionCR patients with anxiety and depression symptoms valued specific group MCT techniques, the opportunity to learn about other patients, and the knowledge of CR staff. The data supports the transferability of treatment to a CR context and advantages that this might bring.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAnxietyCardiac RehabilitationCardiovascular DiseasesCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMetacognitionPsychotherapy, GroupQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSelf Conceptanxietycardiac rehabilitationdepression

Identifiers

PMID34261779
PMCPMC8281095
OpenAlexW3182597595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.