Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261757›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open gastroenterology2021

Systematic review and meta-analysis of gallstone disease treatment outcomes in early cholecystectomy versus conservative management/delayed cholecystectomy.

Bhavani Shankara Bagepally, Madhumitha Haridoss, Akhil Sasidharan, Kayala Venkata Jagadeesh, Nikhil Kumar Oswal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06124989 (A Novel Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Relapse of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06124989 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Relapse of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis (Machine learnINg for the rElapse Risk eValuation in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis - MINERVA)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CagliariRan2024 to 2025Enrolled430ConditionsAcute Pancreatitis, Pancreatitis Due to Gallstones, Pancreatitis Biliary, Pancreatitis RelapsingArmsMINERVA Machine Learning model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Reassessing cholecystectomy timing in gallstone-related acute cholangitis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Impact of COVID-19 on gallbladder disease: presentation of postponed surgeries].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bhavani Shankara BagepallyICMR-NIE Health Technology Assessment Resource Centre, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India bagepally.bs@gov.in.ORCID 0000-0003-0856-767X
Madhumitha HaridossICMR-NIE Health Technology Assessment Resource Centre, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Akhil SasidharanICMR-NIE Health Technology Assessment Resource Centre, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kayala Venkata JagadeeshHealth Technology Assessment in India (HTAIn) Secretariat, Department of Health Research, MoHFW, GOI, New Delhi, India.
Nikhil Kumar OswalDepartment of Surgery, Oswal Hospital, Bangarpet, Karnataka, India.
National Institute of Epidemiology · INDepartment of Health ResearchDr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of early cholecystectomy for gallstone diseases treatment is uncertain compared with conservative management/delayed cholecystectomy.

aimsTo synthesise treatment outcomes of early cholecystectomy versus conservative management/delayed cholecystectomy in terms of its safety and effectiveness.

designWe systematically searched randomised control trials investigating the effectiveness of early cholecystectomy compared with conservative management/delayed cholecystectomy. We pooled the risk ratios with a 95% CI, also estimated adjusted number needed to treat to harm.

resultsOf the 40 included studies for systematic review, 39 studies with 4483 patients are included in meta-analysis. Among the risk ratios of gallstone complications, pain (0.38, 0.20 to 0.74), cholangitis (0.52, 0.28 to 0.97) and total biliary complications (0.33, 0.20 to 0.55) are significantly lower with early cholecystectomy. Adjusted number needed to treat to harm of early cholecystectomy compared with conservative management/delayed cholecystectomy are, for pain 12.5 (8.3 to 33.3), biliary pancreatitis >1000 (50-100), common bile duct stones 100 (33.3 to 100), cholangitis (100 (25-100), total biliary complications 5.9 (4.3 to 9.1) and mortality >1000 (100 to100 000).

conclusionsEarly cholecystectomy may result in fewer biliary complications and a reduction in reported abdominal pain than conservative management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2020 CRD42020192612.

Indexed as

GallstonesPancreatitisCholecystectomyConservative TreatmentHumansTreatment Outcomecholecystectomygallstone diseasemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID34261757
PMCPMC8280848
OpenAlexW3180356073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.