ArticleBMJ open2021
Qualitative analysis of disposition decision making for patients referred for admission from the emergency department without definite medical acuity.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Disposition Decision: A Qualitative Study of Swedish Emergency Physicians' Objectives Through a Value-Focused Thinking Analysis.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Choosing Virtual Versus In-Person Mental Health Crisis Care: A Theoretical Framework for the Decision-Making Process From the Patient's Perspective.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Influence of non-clinical factors on emergency department decision-making: a Delphi study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating GPT-4o for emergency disposition of complex respiratory cases with pulmonology consultation: a diagnostic accuracy study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- "I know you didn't want to stay": emergency department conversations about disposition for people living with dementia.The Gerontologist · 2025Article
- Older Adults' Experiences of Emergency Department Admission Decisions: A Qualitative Study in a Public Safety Net Hospital.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Emergency Department Disposition Times in Adult Level I and Level II Trauma Centers.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Shared Disposition Decision-Making in the Emergency Department for Persons Living with Dementia.Journal of geriatric emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Injury Patterns and Hospital Admission After Trauma Among People Experiencing Homelessness.JAMA network open · 2023Observational
- Clinical risk calculators informing the decision to admit: A methodologic evaluation and assessment of applicability.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo map the physician approach when determining disposition for a patient who presents without the level of definite medical acuity that would generally warrant hospitalisation. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
settingSince 2018, our US academic county hospital/trauma centre has maintained a database in which hospitalists ('triage physicians') document the rationale and outcomes of requests for admission to the acute care medical ward during each shift. STUDY
designNarrative text from the database was analysed using a grounded theory approach to identify major themes and subthemes, and a conceptual model of the admission decision-making process was constructed.
participantsDatabase entries were included (n=300) if the admission call originated from the emergency department and if the triage physician characterised the request as potentially inappropriate because the patient did not have definite medical acuity.
resultsAdmission decision making occurs in three main phases: evaluation of unmet needs, assessment of risk and re-evaluation. Importantly, admission decision making is not solely based on medical acuity or clinical algorithms, and patients without a definite medical need for admission are hospitalised when physicians believe a potential issue exists if discharged. In this way, factors such as homelessness, substance use disorder, frailty, etc, contribute to admission because they raise concern about patient safety and/or barriers to appropriate treatment. Physician decision making can be altered by activities such as care coordination, advocacy by the patient or surrogate, interactions with other physicians or a change in clinical trajectory.
conclusionsThe decision to admit ultimately remains a clinical determination constructed between physician and patient. Physicians use a holistic process that incorporates broad consideration of the patient's medical and social needs with emphasis on risk assessment; thus, any analysis of hospitalisation trends or efforts to impact such should seek to understand this individual-level decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.