Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261679›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Electronic Health Records, Interoperability and Patient Safety in Health Systems of High-income Countries: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Edmond Li, Jonathan Clarke, Ana Luisa Neves, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edmond LiPatient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK edmond.li19@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8209-4490
Jonathan ClarkePatient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1495-7746
Ana Luisa NevesPatient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7107-7211
Hutan AshrafianPatient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1668-0672
Ara DarziPatient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 215938/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe availability and routine use of electronic health records (EHRs) have become commonplace in healthcare systems of many high-income countries. While there is an ever-growing body of literature pertaining to their use, evidence surrounding the importance of EHR interoperability and its impact on patient safety remains less clear. There is, therefore, a need and opportunity to evaluate the evidence available regarding this relationship so as to better inform health informatics development and policies in the years to come. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of EHR interoperability on patient safety in health systems of high-income countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic literature review will be conducted via a computerised search through four databases: PubMed, Embase, Health Management Information Consortium and PsycInfo for relevant articles published between 2010 and 2020. Outcomes of interest will include impact on patient safety and the broader effects on health systems. Quality of the randomised quantitative studies will be assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Non-randomised papers will be evaluated with the Risk of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies-of Interventions tool. Drummond's Checklist will be used for publications pertaining to economic evaluation. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality appraisal checklist will be used to assess qualitative studies. A narrative synthesis will be conducted for included studies, and the body of evidence will be summarised in a summary of findings table. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will summarise published studies with non-identifiable data and, thus, does not require ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated through preprints, open access peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020209285.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient SafetyDelivery of Health CareDeveloped CountriesHumansIncomeResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topichealth informaticshealth policyhealth services administration & managementinformation managementinformation technologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34261679
PMCPMC8280868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.