Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261535›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2021

Synthetic data for annotation and extraction of family history information from clinical text.

Pål H Brekke, Taraka Rama, Ildikó Pilán, Øystein Nytrø, Lilja Øvrelid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pål H BrekkeOslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Department of Cardiology, Sognsvannsveien, Oslo, Norway.
Taraka Rama *University of North Texas, Department of Linguistics, Discovery Park, Denton, TX, USA. taraka.kasi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-6733
Ildikó PilánUniversity of Oslo, Department of Informatics, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Øystein NytrøNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science, Trondheim, Norway.
Lilja ØvrelidUniversity of Oslo, Department of Informatics, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe limited availability of clinical texts for Natural Language Processing purposes is hindering the progress of the field. This article investigates the use of synthetic data for the annotation and automated extraction of family history information from Norwegian clinical text. We make use of incrementally developed synthetic clinical text describing patients' family history relating to cases of cardiac disease and present a general methodology which integrates the synthetically produced clinical statements and annotation guideline development. The resulting synthetic corpus contains 477 sentences and 6030 tokens. In this work we experimentally assess the validity and applicability of the annotated synthetic corpus using machine learning techniques and furthermore evaluate the system trained on synthetic text on a corpus of real clinical text, consisting of de-identified records for patients with genetic heart disease.

resultsFor entity recognition, an SVM trained on synthetic data had class weighted precision, recall and F

conclusionsA system for extraction of family history information developed on synthetic data generalizes well to real, clinical notes with a small loss of accuracy. The methodology outlined in this paper may be useful in other situations where limited availability of clinical text hinders NLP tasks. Both the annotation guidelines and the annotated synthetic corpus are made freely available and as such constitutes the first publicly available resource of Norwegian clinical text.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNatural Language ProcessingHumansLanguageCorpus annotationFamily historyHeart diseaseNatural language processingSynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID34261535
PMCPMC8278746
OpenAlexW3180465085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.