Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261525›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

Dynamics of dark fermentation microbial communities in the light of lactate and butyrate production.

Anna Detman, Daniel Laubitz, Aleksandra Chojnacka, Pawel R Kiela, Agnieszka Salamon, Albert Barberán, Yongjian Chen, Fei Yang, Mieczysław K Błaszczyk, Anna Sikora

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Can bio-HFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Probiotic StrainInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna DetmanInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics - Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5a, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.
Daniel LaubitzDepartment of Pediatrics at Steel Children's Research Center College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Room 3301, PO Box 245073, Tucson, Arizona, 85724-5073, USA.
Aleksandra ChojnackaInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics - Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5a, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.
Pawel R KielaDepartment of Pediatrics at Steel Children's Research Center College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Room 3301, PO Box 245073, Tucson, Arizona, 85724-5073, USA.
Agnieszka SalamonInstitute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology, Rakowiecka 36, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland.
Albert BarberánDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, 1177 E. 4th Street, P.O. Box 210038, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0038, USA.
Yongjian ChenDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, 1177 E. 4th Street, P.O. Box 210038, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0038, USA.
Fei YangDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, 1177 E. 4th Street, P.O. Box 210038, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0038, USA.
Mieczysław K BłaszczykFaculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna SikoraInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics - Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5a, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland. annaw@ibb.waw.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-9464-6851
University of Arizona · USInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PLInstitute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study focuses on the processes occurring during the acidogenic step of anaerobic digestion, especially resulting from nutritional interactions between dark fermentation (DF) bacteria and lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Previously, we have confirmed that DF microbial communities (MCs) that fed on molasses are able to convert lactate and acetate to butyrate. The aims of the study were to recognize the biodiversity of DF-MCs able and unable to convert lactate and acetate to butyrate and to define the conditions for the transformation.

resultsMCs sampled from a DF bioreactor were grown anaerobically in mesophilic conditions on different media containing molasses or sucrose and/or lactate and acetate in five independent static batch experiments. The taxonomic composition (based on 16S_rRNA profiling) of each experimental MC was analysed in reference to its metabolites and pH of the digestive liquids. In the samples where the fermented media contained carbohydrates, the two main tendencies were observed: (i) a low pH (pH ≤ 4), lactate and ethanol as the main fermentation products, MCs dominated with Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Leuconostoc and Fructobacillus was characterized by low biodiversity; (ii) pH in the range 5.0-6.0, butyrate dominated among the fermentation products, the MCs composed mainly of Clostridium (especially Clostridium_sensu_stricto_12), Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Prevotella. The biodiversity increased with the ability to convert acetate and lactate to butyrate. The MC processing exclusively lactate and acetate showed the highest biodiversity and was dominated by Clostridium (especially Clostridium_sensu_stricto_12). LAB were reduced; other genera such as Terrisporobacter, Lachnoclostridium, Paraclostridium or Sutterella were found. Butyrate was the main metabolite and pH was 7. Shotgun metagenomic analysis of the selected butyrate-producing MCs independently on the substrate revealed C.tyrobutyricum as the dominant Clostridium species. Functional analysis confirmed the presence of genes encoding key enzymes of the fermentation routes.

conclusionsBatch tests revealed the dynamics of metabolic activity and composition of DF-MCs dependent on fermentation conditions. The balance between LAB and the butyrate producers and the pH values were shown to be the most relevant for the process of lactate and acetate conversion to butyrate. To close the knowledge gaps is to find signalling factors responsible for the metabolic shift of the DF-MCs towards lactate fermentation. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

ButyratesMicrobiotaBioreactorsFermentationLactic AcidButyratesLactic AcidAcetateButyrateDark fermentationLactateLactic acid bacteriaMicrobial communitiesNutritional interactions

Identifiers

PMID34261525
PMCPMC8281708
OpenAlexW3119555328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.