Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261481›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2021

Comparative study of renal drainage with different ureteral stents subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction using an in vitro ureter-stent model.

Yaniv Shilo, Jonathan Modai, Dan Leibovici, Ishai Dror, Brian Berkowitz

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Magnetic resonance imaging of in vitro urine flow in single and tandem stented ureters subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaniv ShiloDepartment of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, 7661041, Rehovot, Israel.
Jonathan ModaiDepartment of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, 7661041, Rehovot, Israel.
Dan LeiboviciDepartment of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, 7661041, Rehovot, Israel.
Ishai DrorDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001, Rehovot, Israel.
Brian BerkowitzDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001, Rehovot, Israel. brian.berkowitz@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3078-1859
Kaplan Medical Center · ILWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the efficacy of different ureteral stents subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction (EUO), in a controlled in vitro stented ureter experiment.

methodsWe employ an in vitro ureter-stent experimental set-up, with latex tubing simulating flexible ureters attached to vessels simulating renal units and bladders. The flow behavior of five ureteral stents-polymeric 8F, tandem 6F, tandem 7F, endopyelotomy and metal-was tested under a ureteral deformation configuration of 40°, with 2000 g external force over a 3.5 cm length of the ureter. A constant fluid flow was applied through the ureter-stent configurations, and pressure fluctuations in the renal unit were monitored. We considered a renal unit pressure of 10 cmH

resultsOf all assessed ureteral stents, under EUO conditions, only the single 8F stents remained patent throughout the length of the experiment. All other stents-tandem 6F and 7F, single 7F, metal and endopyelotomy-displayed limitations.

conclusionsTandem and metal stents show no superiority over large luminal polymeric stents for EUO treatment in this in vitro model. Larger luminal stents offer excellent resistance to external pressure and allow adequate colloidal flow. The need for frequent exchange and bladder irritation should also be considered in the choice of stent configuration for treatment of kidney drainage under EUO.

Indexed as

Materials TestingStentsDrainageHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKidneyProsthesis DesignUreteral ObstructionColloidsEndopyelotomyMetal stentsStent failureTandem stents

Identifiers

PMID34261481
PMCPMC8281631
OpenAlexW3183041962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.