Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261452›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2021

Hahn-PCNN-CNN: an end-to-end multi-modal brain medical image fusion framework useful for clinical diagnosis.

Kai Guo, Xiongfei Li, Xiaohan Hu, Jichen Liu, Tiehu Fan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai GuoKey Laboratory of Symbolic Computation and Knowledge Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xiongfei LiKey Laboratory of Symbolic Computation and Knowledge Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xiaohan HuDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. xhhu@jlu.edu.cn.
Jichen LiuCollege of Software, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Tiehu FanCollege of Instrumentation and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jilin University · CNFirst Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn medical diagnosis of brain, the role of multi-modal medical image fusion is becoming more prominent. Among them, there is no lack of filtering layered fusion and newly emerging deep learning algorithms. The former has a fast fusion speed but the fusion image texture is blurred; the latter has a better fusion effect but requires higher machine computing capabilities. Therefore, how to find a balanced algorithm in terms of image quality, speed and computing power is still the focus of all scholars.

methodsWe built an end-to-end Hahn-PCNN-CNN. The network is composed of feature extraction module, feature fusion module and image reconstruction module. We selected 8000 multi-modal brain medical images downloaded from the Harvard Medical School website to train the feature extraction layer and image reconstruction layer to enhance the network's ability to reconstruct brain medical images. In the feature fusion module, we use the moments of the feature map combined with the pulse-coupled neural network to reduce the information loss caused by convolution in the previous fusion module and save time.

resultsWe choose eight sets of registered multi-modal brain medical images in four diease to verify our model. The anatomical structure images are from MRI and the functional metabolism images are SPECT and 18F-FDG. At the same time, we also selected eight representative fusion models as comparative experiments. In terms of objective quality evaluation, we select six evaluation metrics in five categories to evaluate our model.

conclusionsThe fusion image obtained by our model can retain the effective information in source images to the greatest extent. In terms of image fusion evaluation metrics, our model is superior to other comparison algorithms. In terms of time computational efficiency, our model also performs well. In terms of robustness, our model is very stable and can be generalized to multi-modal image fusion of other organs.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAlzheimer DiseaseBrainBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, BronchogenicDeep LearningGliomaHumansHuntington DiseaseBrain medical image fusionClinical diagnosisDeep learningHahn momentMulti-modal brain medical image

Identifiers

PMID34261452
PMCPMC8278599
OpenAlexW3181721181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.