Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261433›Full record

ReviewBiological procedures online2021

Review of applications of CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology in cancer research.

Ziyi Zhao, Chenxi Li, Fei Tong, Jingkuang Deng, Guofu Huang, Yi Sang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological procedures online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. 3Bs of CRISPR-Cas mediated genome editing in plants: exploring the basics, bioinformatics and biosafety landscape.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ziyi Zhao *The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330008, China.
Chenxi Li *The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330008, China.
Fei Tong *Orthodontic Department of Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330008, China.
Jingkuang DengThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330008, China.
Guofu HuangThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330008, China. ncsdyyy222@163.com.
Yi SangThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330008, China. ndsfy001889@ncu.edu.cn.
Third Hospital of Nanchang · CNNanchang University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterized by multiple complex mutations, including activation by oncogenes and inhibition by tumor suppressors, cancer is one of the leading causes of death. Application of CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology in cancer research has aroused great interest, promoting the exploration of the molecular mechanism of cancer progression and development of precise therapy. CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology provides a solid basis for identifying driver and passenger mutations in cancer genomes, which is of great value in genetic screening and for developing cancer models and treatments. This article reviews the current applications of CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology in various cancer studies, the challenges faced, and the existing solutions, highlighting the potential of this technology for cancer treatment.

Indexed as

CancerCancer treatmentCas9CRISPRHigh throughput screening

Identifiers

PMID34261433
PMCPMC8281662
OpenAlexW3182865713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.