Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261430›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Association between gestational weight gain in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Ping Shi, Aimin Liu, Xiaoyan Yin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ping ShiWujin Hospital Affiliated With Jiangsu University, Tianning District, No 2 Yongning North Road, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Aimin LiuWujin Hospital Affiliated With Jiangsu University, Tianning District, No 2 Yongning North Road, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaoyan YinWujin Hospital Affiliated With Jiangsu University, Tianning District, No 2 Yongning North Road, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China. yinxiaoyancz@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-5736
Jiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo examine association between gestational weight gain (GWG) in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs).

methodsThis retrospective cohort study enrolled women with GDM who delivered at 2010-2020 in Changzhou, Jiangsu. Total GWG, rates of GWG in second trimester and third trimesters were stratified into three categories according to IOM guidelines: within, below, and above IOM guidelines. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used.

resultsOverall, 1606 women with GDM fulfilled inclusion criteria. Compared with within IOM guidelines and after adjusting for confounders, total GWG above IOM guidelines in pregnancy was associated with an increased odds of caesarean delivery [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.72], hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (aOR = 2.00, 1.28-3.12), preeclampsia (aOR = 2.06, 1.01-3.12), macrosomia (aOR = 1.55, 1.13-2.13) and large for gestational age (LGA) (aOR = 2.82, 1.94-3.23), and a decreased odds of premature rupture of membrane (PROM) (aOR = 0.46, 0.36-0.60) and preterm birth (aOR = 0.35, 0.26-0.44); total GWG below IOM guidelines in pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (aOR = 1.96, 1.44-2.66), small for gestational age (SGA) (aOR = 1.32, 1.11-1.50) and a decreased odds of macrosomia (aOR = 0.35, 0.23-0.53) and LGA (aOR = 0.54, 0.42-0.72). Further, in both second and third trimesters of pregnancy, rates of GWG above IOM guidelines was found to be associated with a high odds of HDP (aOR = 2.55, 1.86-3.38; aOR = 1.93, 1.08-2.98), preeclampsia (aOR = 2.28, 1.21-3.81; aOR = 2.17, 1.35-4.37), macrosomia (aOR = 1.20, 1.02-1.82; aOR = 2.02, 1.51-2.64) and LGA (aOR = 1.42, 1.24-1.97; aOR = 1.79, 1.51-2.54). Rates of GWG above IOM guidelines in third trimester of pregnancy also increased odds of caesarean delivery (aOR = 1.48, 1.16-2.34) when compared with within IOM guidelines. While rates of GWG below IOM guidelines in both second and third trimesters of pregnancy was associated with a decreased odds of macrosomia (aOR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52-0.78; aOR = 0.52, 0.39-0.63) and LGA(aOR = 0.71, 0.51-0.82; aOR = 0.67, 0.55-0.79). In addition, rate of GWG below IOM guidelines in third trimester of pregnancy was associated with an increased odds of preterm birth (aOR = 1.52, 1.12-2.05) and SGA (aOR = 1.21, 1.10-1.69).

conclusionGWG, outside IOM guidelines has increased risks of APOs among women with GDM, implying that careful surveillance for GWG during different stages of pregnancy is warranted.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainGuidelines as TopicPregnancy TrimestersAdultChinaCohort StudiesDiabetes, GestationalFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant, Small for Gestational AgeNational Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine DivisionOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeAdverse pregnancy outcomesGestational diabetes mellitusGestational weight gainInstitute of Medicine guidelines

Identifiers

PMID34261430
PMCPMC8281617
OpenAlexW3148372230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.