Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261122›Full record

ArticleNurse educator

Meeting Undergraduate Nursing Students' Clinical Needs: A Comparison of Traditional Clinical, Face-to-Face Simulation, and Screen-Based Simulation Learning Environments.

Kim Leighton, Suzan Kardong-Edgren, Tonya Schneidereith, Colette Foisy-Doll, Katherine A Wuestney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nurse educator. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Predictors of success in the registered nurse licensure exam for nursing graduates whose education was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.Teaching and learning in nursing : official journal of the National Organization for Assciate Degree Nursing · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim LeightonAuthor Affiliations: Executive Director (Dr Leighton), Itqan Clinical Simulation & Innovation Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Associate Professor (Dr Kardong-Edgren), Health Professions Education, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts; Associate Professor (Dr Schneidereith), Debra L. Spunt Clinical Simulation Labs, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland; Director (Mrs Foisy-Doll), Clinical Simulation Centre, MacEwan University Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Graduate Student (Ms Wuestney), College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane.
Suzan Kardong-Edgren
Tonya Schneidereith
Colette Foisy-Doll
Katherine A Wuestney

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurse educators expanded replacement of traditional clinical practice and face-to-face simulation experiences with screen-based simulation (SBS) during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to understand the student experience when learning in 3 types of clinical education environments.

methodsThis quantitative descriptive survey study used the Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey 2.0 (CLECS 2.0) to compare prelicensure nursing students' perceptions of learning in 3 clinical learning environments.

resultsThe CLECS 2.0 was completed by 113 participants from 3 countries. Most scores were highest for the traditional clinical practice environment, and all were lowest for the SBS environment.

conclusionsThe findings are concerning as discussions about whether SBS can replace traditional clinical practice hours unfolds. The findings support the need for concentrated efforts to improve specific areas of the SBS experience.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, NursingHumansNursing Education ResearchSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34261122
PMCPMC8579887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.