Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34261045›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021

Development and validation of a longitudinal soft-tissue metastatic lesion matching algorithm.

Victor Santoro-Fernandes, Daniel Huff, Mathew L Scarpelli, Timothy G Perk, Mark R Albertini, Scott Perlman, Stephen S F Yip, Robert Jeraj

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Automated lesion tracking and treatment response classification on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. coPERCIST: AI-assisted PET-CT response assessment.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Models using comprehensive, lesion-level, longitudinal [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Victor Santoro-FernandesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6965-0448
Daniel HuffSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9792-4119
Mathew L ScarpelliDepartment of Neuroimaging, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America.
Timothy G PerkSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9906-5087
Mark R AlbertiniSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Scott PerlmanSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Stephen S F YipAIQ Global, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Robert JerajSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USBarrow Neurological Institute · US

Funding

U.W. RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bryan Patrick Bednarz · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic cancer presents with many, sometimes hundreds of metastatic lesions through the body, which often respond heterogeneously to treatment. Therefore, lesion-level assessment is necessary for a complete understanding of disease response. Lesion-level assessment typically requires manual matching of corresponding lesions, which is a tedious, subjective, and error-prone task. This study introduces a fully automated algorithm for matching of metastatic lesions in longitudinal medical images. The algorithm entails four steps: (1) image registration, (2) lesion dilation, (3) lesion clustering, and (4) linear assignment. In step (1), 3D deformable registration is used to register the scans. In step (2), lesion contours are conformally dilated. In step (3), lesion clustering is evaluated based on local metrics. In step (4), matching is assigned based on non-greedy cost minimization. The algorithm was optimized (e.g. choice of deformable registration algorithm, dilatation size) and validated on 140 scan-pairs of 32 metastatic cancer patients from two independent clinical trials, who received longitudinal PET/CT scans as part of their treatment response assessment. Registration error was evaluated using landmark distance. A sensitivity study was performed to evaluate the optimal lesion dilation magnitude. Lesion matching performance accuracy was evaluated for all patients and for a subset with high disease burden. Two investigated deformable registration approaches (whole body deformable and articulated deformable registrations) led to similar performance with the overall registration accuracy between 2.3 and 2.6 mm. The optimal dilation magnitude of 25 mm yielded almost a perfect matching accuracy of 0.98. No significant matching accuracy decrease was observed in the subset of patients with high lesion disease burden. In summary, lesion matching using our new algorithm was highly accurate and a significant improvement, when compared to previously established methods. The proposed method enables accurate automated metastatic lesion matching in whole-body longitudinal scans.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computedimage registrationlesion matchingPET/CTtreatment response assessment

Identifiers

PMID34261045
PMCPMC11329192
OpenAlexW3181081288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.