Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34260856›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2021

A Comprehensive Non-targeted Analysis Study of the Prenatal Exposome.

Dimitri Abrahamsson, Aolin Wang, Ting Jiang, Miaomiao Wang, Adi Siddharth, Rachel Morello-Frosch, June-Soo Park, Marina Sirota, Tracey J Woodruff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitri AbrahamssonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco 94143, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3402-7565
Aolin WangDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco 94143, California, United States.
Ting JiangDepartment of Toxic Substances Control, Environmental Chemistry Laboratory, California Environmental Protection Agency, Berkeley 94710, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4408-7852
Miaomiao WangDepartment of Toxic Substances Control, Environmental Chemistry Laboratory, California Environmental Protection Agency, Berkeley 94710, California, United States.
Adi SiddharthDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco 94143, California, United States.
Rachel Morello-FroschDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management and School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley 94720, California, United States.
June-Soo ParkDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco 94143, California, United States.
Marina SirotaBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco 94158, California, United States.
Tracey J WoodruffDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco 94143, California, United States.
University of California, San Francisco · USCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

The Illinois Kids Development Study ECHO Pregnancy and Pediatric CohortUH3OD023272 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Andrea Aguiar, Susan L Schantz · 2018 to 2026
$18.6M
UCSF Environmental Research and Translation for Health Center (EaRTH Center)P30ES030284 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Diana J Laird · 2020 to 2026
$11.2M
The Illinois Kids Development Study ECHO Pregnancy and Pediatric CohortUG3OD023272 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SCHANTZ, SUSAN L · 2016 to 2024
$7.2M
Transdisciplinary Approach to Rapidly Identify Reproductive Toxics in Pregnant Women and NewbornsR01ES027051 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Dimitri Abrahamsson, Tracey J. Woodruff · 2016 to 2026
$6.6M
The UCSF Pregnancy Exposures to Environmental Chemicals (PEEC) Children's CenterP01ES022841 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MORELLO-FROSCH, RACHEL ADELE · 2013 to 2018
$3.9M
Project 2: Assessing the Effects on BPA Exposure on Early Human DevelopmentP20ES018135 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WOODRUFF, TRACEY J. · 2010 to 2012
$617k
Non-target analysis of maternal and cord blood samples: Advancing computational tools and discovering novel chemicalsK99ES032892 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ABRAHAMSSON, DIMITRI · 2021 to 2022
$200k
NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES032892NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES022841NIEHS NIH HHS P20 ES018135NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030284NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027051NIH HHS UG3 OD023272NIH HHS UH3 OD023272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances in mass spectrometry have enabled us to screen biological samples for a very broad spectrum of chemical compounds allowing us to more comprehensively characterize the human exposome in critical periods of development. The goal of this study was three-fold: (1) to analyze 590 matched maternal and cord blood samples (total 295 pairs) using non-targeted analysis (NTA); (2) to examine the differences in chemical abundance between maternal and cord blood samples; and (3) to examine the associations between exogenous chemicals and endogenous metabolites. We analyzed all samples with high-resolution mass spectrometry using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF/MS) in both positive and negative electrospray ionization modes (ESI+ and ESI-) and in soft ionization (MS) and fragmentation (MS/MS) modes for prioritized features. We confirmed 19 unique compounds with analytical standards, we tentatively identified 73 compounds with MS/MS spectra matching, and we annotated 98 compounds using an annotation algorithm. We observed 103 significant associations in maternal and 128 in cord samples between compounds annotated as endogenous and compounds annotated as exogenous. An example of these relationships was an association between three poly and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and endogenous fatty acids in both the maternal and cord samples indicating potential interactions between PFASs and fatty acid regulating proteins.

Indexed as

ExposomeTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansPregnancySpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionizationblood samplesexposomehigh-resolution mass spectrometrymolecular interaction networksnon-targeted analysisper- and polyfluoroalkyl substancespregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34260856
PMCPMC8338910
OpenAlexW3182978886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.