Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34260662›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning.

Christopher Ryan King, Joanna Abraham, Bradley A Fritz, Zhicheng Cui, William Galanter, Yixin Chen, Thomas Kannampallil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher Ryan KingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4574-8616
Joanna AbrahamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Bradley A FritzDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Zhicheng CuiDepartment of Computer Science, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
William GalanterDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Yixin ChenDepartment of Computer Science, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Thomas KannampallilDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCHT32GM108539 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Aaron J Norris · 2014 to 2026
$4.9M
An Etiology for Medication Ordering Errors in CPOE SystemsR21HS025443 · AHRQ · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ABRAHAM, JOANNA · 2017 to 2018
$291k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS025443NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM108539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current approaches to understanding medication ordering errors rely on relatively small manually captured error samples. These approaches are resource-intensive, do not scale for computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, and are likely to miss important risk factors associated with medication ordering errors. Previously, we described a dataset of CPOE-based medication voiding accompanied by univariable and multivariable regression analyses. However, these traditional techniques require expert guidance and may perform poorly compared to newer approaches. In this paper, we update that analysis using machine learning (ML) models to predict erroneous medication orders and identify its contributing factors. We retrieved patient demographics (race/ethnicity, sex, age), clinician characteristics, type of medication order (inpatient, prescription, home medication by history), and order content. We compared logistic regression, random forest, boosted decision trees, and artificial neural network models. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The dataset included 5,804,192 medication orders, of which 28,695 (0.5%) were voided. ML correctly classified voids at reasonable accuracy; with a positive predictive value of 10%, ~20% of errors were included. Gradient boosted decision trees achieved the highest AUROC (0.7968) and AUPRC (0.0647) among all models. Logistic regression had the poorest performance. Models identified predictive factors with high face validity (e.g., student orders), and a decision tree revealed interacting contexts with high rates of errors not identified by previous regression models. Prediction models using order-entry information offers promise for error surveillance, patient safety improvements, and targeted clinical review. The improved performance of models with complex interactions points to the importance of contextual medication ordering information for understanding contributors to medication errors.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedication ErrorsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMaleMedical Order Entry SystemsMiddle AgedROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID34260662
PMCPMC8279397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.