Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34260631›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

RETRACTED: Molecular docking and dynamics simulation study of bioactive compounds from Ficus carica L. with important anticancer drug targets.

Arun Bahadur Gurung, Mohammad Ajmal Ali, Joongku Lee, Mohammad Abul Farah, Khalid Mashay Al-Anazi

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Insights into the Therapeutic Targets and Molecular Mechanisms ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessment of the Anti-adipogenic Effect ofCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Physicochemistry, Nutritional, and Therapeutic Potential ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arun Bahadur GurungDepartment of Basic Sciences and Social Sciences, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4612-9008
Mohammad Ajmal AliDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Joongku LeeDepartment of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Mohammad Abul FarahGenetics Laboratory, Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Mashay Al-AnaziGenetics Laboratory, Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ficus carica L., commonly known as fig, has been used in traditional medicine for metabolic disorders, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases and cancer. Various bioactive compounds have been previously isolated from the leaves, fruit, and bark, which have different pharmacological properties, but the anticancer mechanisms of this plant are not known. In the current study we focused on understanding the probable mechanisms underlying the anticancer activity of F. carica plant extracts by molecular docking and dynamic simulation approaches. We evaluated the drug-likeness of the active constituents of the plant and explored its binding affinity with selected anticancer drug target receptors such as cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK-2), cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK-6), topoisomerase-I (Topo I), topoisomerase-II (Topo II), B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). In silico toxicity studies revealed that thirteen molecules out of sixty-eight major active compounds in the plant extract have acceptable drug-like properties. Compound 37 (β-bourbonene) has a good binding affinity with the majority of drug targets, as revealed by molecular docking studies. The complexes of the lead molecules with the drug receptors were stable in terms of molecular dynamics simulation derived parameters such as root mean square deviation and radius of gyration. The top ten residues contributing significantly to the binding free energies were deciphered through analysis of molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) and molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA). Thus, the results of our studies unravel the potential of F. carica bioactive compounds as anticancer candidate molecules against selected macromolecular receptors.

Indexed as

FicusMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationPlant ExtractsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicHumansProtein BindingVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPlant ExtractsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2

Identifiers

PMID34260631
PMCPMC8279321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.