Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34260623›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Additively manufactured patient-specific prosthesis for tumor reconstruction: Design, process, and properties.

Maryam Tilton, Gregory S Lewis, Michael W Hast, Edward Fox, Guha Manogharan

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The expanding role of additive manufacturing in orthopaedic traumatology.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  4. Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam TiltonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4495-5813
Gregory S LewisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Michael W HastBiedermann Lab for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Edward FoxDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Guha ManogharanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Design and processing capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM) to fabricate complex geometries continues to drive the adoption of AM for biomedical applications. In this study, a validated design methodology is presented to evaluate AM as an effective fabrication technique for reconstruction of large bone defects after tumor resection in pediatric oncology patients. Implanting off-the-shelf components in pediatric patients is especially challenging because most standard components are sized and shaped for more common adult cases. While currently reported efforts on AM implants are focused on maxillofacial, hip and knee reconstructions, there have been no reported studies on reconstruction of proximal humerus tumors. A case study of a 9-year-old diagnosed with proximal humerus osteosarcoma was used to develop a patient-specific AM prosthesis for the humerus following tumor resection. Commonly used body-centered cubic (BCC) structures were incorporated at the surgical neck and distal interface in order to increase the effective surface area, promote osseointegration, and reduce the implant weight. A patient-specific prosthesis was fabricated using electron beam melting method from biocompatible Ti-6Al-4V. Both computational and biomechanical tests were performed on the prosthesis to evaluate its biomechanical behavior under varying loading conditions. Morphological analysis of the construct using micro-computed tomography was used to compare the as-designed and as-built prosthesis. It was found that the patient-specific prosthesis could withstand physiologically-relevant loading conditions with minimal permanent deformation (82 μm after 105 cycles) at the medial aspect of the porous surgical neck. These outcomes support potential translation of the patient-specific AM prostheses to reconstruct large bone defects following tumor resection.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalProsthesis DesignChildFinite Element AnalysisHumansHumerusImaging, Three-DimensionalMaterials TestingOsseointegrationOsteosarcomaOsteotomyPorosityProsthesis ImplantationSurface PropertiesTitaniumX-Ray MicrotomographyTitanium

Identifiers

PMID34260623
PMCPMC8279401
OpenAlexW3182276183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.