Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34260619›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Impact of sex on use of low tidal volume ventilation in invasively ventilated ICU patients-A mediation analysis using two observational cohorts.

Pien Swart, Rodrigo Octavio Deliberato, Alistair E W Johnson, Tom J Pollard, Lucas Bulgarelli, Paolo Pelosi, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Marcus J Schultz, Ary Serpa Neto

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pien SwartDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3712-7799
Rodrigo Octavio DeliberatoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alistair E W JohnsonLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Institute for Medical Engineering & Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Tom J PollardLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Institute for Medical Engineering & Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5676-7898
Lucas BulgarelliLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Institute for Medical Engineering & Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Paolo PelosiIRCCS San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Marcelo Gama de AbreuPulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Marcus J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ary Serpa NetoDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies in patients receiving invasive ventilation show important differences in use of low tidal volume (VT) ventilation (LTVV) between females and males. The aims of this study were to describe temporal changes in VT and to determine what factors drive the sex difference in use of LTVV. METHODS AND

findingsThis is a posthoc analysis of 2 large longitudinal projects in 59 ICUs in the United States, the 'Medical information Mart for Intensive Care III' (MIMIC III) and the 'eICU Collaborative Research DataBase'. The proportion of patients under LTVV (median VT < 8 ml/kg PBW), was the primary outcome. Mediation analysis, a method to dissect total effect into direct and indirect effects, was used to understand which factors drive the sex difference. We included 3614 (44%) females and 4593 (56%) males. Median VT declined over the years, but with a persistent difference between females (from median 10.2 (9.1 to 11.4) to 8.2 (7.5 to 9.1) ml/kg PBW) vs. males (from median 9.2 [IQR 8.2 to 10.1] to 7.3 [IQR 6.6 to 8.0] ml/kg PBW) (P < .001). In females versus males, use of LTVV increased from 5 to 50% versus from 12 to 78% (difference, -27% [-29% to -25%]; P < .001). The sex difference was mainly driven by patients' body height and actual body weight (adjusted average causal mediation effect, -30% [-33% to -27%]; P < .001, and 4 [3% to 4%]; P < .001).

conclusionsWhile LTVV is increasingly used in females and males, females continue to receive LTVV less often than males. The sex difference is mainly driven by patients' body height and actual body weight, and not necessarily by sex. Use of LTVV in females could improve by paying more attention to a correct calculation of VT, i.e., using the correct body height.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMediation AnalysisRespiration, ArtificialSex CharacteristicsBody WeightCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisTidal Volume

Identifiers

PMID34260619
PMCPMC8279424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.